Quantum Numbers J,S and L in p+n and n+n system

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around quantum numbers J, S, and L in the context of nuclear systems, specifically the n + p and n + n systems. The original poster seeks to understand the implications of these quantum numbers on the existence of bound states, particularly for two neutrons.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to list quantum states for the n + p system and questions the validity of their findings regarding the S=1 states. They also explore the implications of the Pauli exclusion principle on the n + n system and the conditions under which certain states are forbidden.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's attempts, providing feedback on the correctness of the quantum states listed. There is a focus on the symmetry requirements for the n + n system, with some guidance offered regarding the need for antisymmetry in the overall state. Multiple interpretations of the implications of quantum numbers are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the effects of the Pauli exclusion principle and the symmetry of quantum states, particularly in relation to the spin and orbital angular momentum of the particles involved. There is an ongoing discussion about how to determine the allowed states based on these principles.

Fluffy86
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey,
I have some problems concerning one of the exercises I got last week

Homework Statement


List the quantum numbers J,S,L (in spectroscopic notation ^{2S+1}L_J for partial waves of the n + p systemup to total angular momentum J=2
The quantum numbers J, S and L represent the total angular momentum, the total spin, and the relativ orbital momentum, repectively.
b) Repeat for the n+n system
c) Use the above information, together with the known spectroscopy of the deuteron, to explain why there are no bound states of two neutrons

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok first of all we can have S=0 or S=1. Then we go through the different L states.
With L=0: S L=1 : P L=2: D
S=0:
L=0: ^1S_0
L=1: ^1P_1
L=2: ^1D_2

Now I have some problems with the S=1 states. Let's assume we have L=1 and S=1. What values can J have. Is it the same as I learned for the electron orbits J=|L-S|..L+S? So can J be in the example be 0,1 and 2?
When yes then I get 7 additional cases
S=1
L=0: ^3S_1
L=1: ^3P_0 ^3P_1 ^3P_2
L=2: ^3D_1 ^3D_2
L=3: ^3F_2

I have really no idea if this is correct or not. But when this is true I am not sure about the second part. Now we have a n+n system, this means we have to consider the Pauli principle. Which of the combination is than not allowed any longer? Of course the ^3S_1 one, because then both have same spin. But are all S=1 states forbidden, even when they have a relative angular momentum?

In the last part the question about a bound state of 2 neutrons. I know that the ground state in the deuteron is the ^3S_1 state. This one is not allowed in the 2 neutron system, but why not the next higher state is the ground state for the 2 neutrons?(e.g. the first excited state of the deuteron)

Would be really nice if you could help me
Best regards
Fluffy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fluffy86 said:
Ok, first of all we can have S=0 or S=1. Then we go through the different L states.
With L=0: S L=1 : P L=2: D
S=0:
L=0: ^1S_0
L=1: ^1P_1
L=2: ^1D_2

Now I have some problems with the S=1 states. Let's assume we have L=1 and S=1. What values can J have. Is it the same as I learned for the electron orbits J=|L-S|..L+S? So can J be in the example be 0,1 and 2?
Yup.
When yes then I get 7 additional cases
S=1
L=0: ^3S_1
L=1: ^3P_0, ^03P_1, ^3P_2
L=2: ^3D_1, ^3D_2
L=3: ^3F_2

I have really no idea if this is correct or not.
Looks good.
But when this is true I am not sure about the second part. Now we have a n+n system, this means we have to consider the Pauli principle. Which of the combination is than not allowed any longer? Of course the ^3S_1 one, because then both have same spin. But are all S=1 states forbidden, even when they have a relative angular momentum?
The symmetry of the entire state needs to be antisymmetric for the two-neutron system. The S=1 spin state is symmetric, so the orbital part of the state needs to be antisymmetric so that the state as a whole is antisymmetric.
 
Thx a lot!
Do you mean with an antisymmetric orbital part that the L has to be 1 or 3 or how do I know what symmetry the orbital part has?

Fluffy
 
Fluffy86 said:
Do you mean with an antisymmetric orbital part that the L has to be 1 or 3 or how do I know what symmetry the orbital part has?
Yes, that's what I meant. I'm not sure how you'd subsequently rule those states out for the n-n system though.
 
hmm maybe it is possible to argue with the parity, the relative orbital momentum gives (-1)^l so in the n+n system and S=1 l has to be an odd number and in the S=0 and even number?
Or am I thinking totally wrong?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K