The discussion centers around the validity of the quantum number set (3, -2, 0, 1/2) in the context of quantum mechanics. Participants explore the constraints on quantum numbers, particularly focusing on the principal quantum number (n), azimuthal quantum number (l), magnetic quantum number (ml), and spin quantum number (ms).
There is a general agreement that l cannot be negative, but the discussion reveals some confusion regarding the implications of this on the validity of the quantum number set. Multiple viewpoints exist on the interpretation of the quantum number constraints.
Participants express uncertainty about the implications of the quantum number rules and the specific ranges for ml and l. The discussion does not resolve the initial question regarding the validity of the quantum number set.
Feodalherren said:Homework Statement
Why isn't (3, -2 , 0 , 1/2) a valid quantum number?Homework Equations
The Attempt at a Solution
n=3
so l = -2 is valid.
-l≤Ml≤l
2≤Ml≤-2
nonsensical statement. I don't know what to do...