Quantum Numbers: Why (3,-2,0,1/2) is Invalid

AI Thread Summary
The quantum number set (3, -2, 0, 1/2) is invalid because the azimuthal quantum number l cannot be negative; it must be a non-negative integer. For n=3, valid values for l are 0, 1, or 2. The magnetic quantum number ml can take values from -l to l, but since l is invalid here, the entire set is disqualified. Additionally, the spin quantum number ms can be either -1/2 or 1/2, which is acceptable. Therefore, the primary issue lies in the incorrect value of l.
Feodalherren
Messages
604
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Why isn't (3, -2 , 0 , 1/2) a valid quantum number?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


n=3

so l = -2 is valid.

-l≤Ml≤l

2≤Ml≤-2
nonsensical statement. I don't know what to do...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Feodalherren said:

Homework Statement


Why isn't (3, -2 , 0 , 1/2) a valid quantum number?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


n=3

so l = -2 is valid.

-l≤Ml≤l

2≤Ml≤-2
nonsensical statement. I don't know what to do...

No, l=-2 is not valid. l is always non-negative.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Ah so it's that simple... Thanks.
 
I agree.
n = 3
l = 0, 1, 2
ml = -2, -1, 0, 1, 2
ms = -1/2 or 1/2

l cannot be negative, but ml can be.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top