I Quantum Oscillator in 1D: How Can a Real Particle Have an Imaginary Velocity?

RealKiller69
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
I have got a simple qstion.
We have a particle in 1d oscillator with E0( fundamental level).We know that phi~ e^-x^2 for any x, so We can measure a position and get a value x=a, such that V(a)>E0 . In this case T<0 so the velocity of the particle is imaginary, how is this even possible?, (a real particle moving an imaginary velocity.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RealKiller69 said:
We can measure a position and get a value x=a, such that V(a)>E0
Yes
RealKiller69 said:
T<0 so the velocity of the particle is imaginary
What is 'the velocity of the particle' in your context ?
 
BvU said:
Yes
What is 'the velocity of the particle' in your context ?
Thats what I am trying to figure out, i can consider a wave package when the particle is in the permitted region for tht energy but if it gets out of that region ( the wave function doesn't restrict the particle in a specific region) i will get an imaginary value for the momentum. How do i interpret this thought experiment??.
 
In QM, the 1-D momentum operator is ##\ \displaystyle { {\hbar\over i }{\partial \over \partial x }} \quad ## imaginary everywhere (*) -- no difference left or right of each of the classical turning points ...

As you found, the classically forbidden region past the turning points comes with a negative kinetic energy

Note that the expectation value for the momentum as well as for the position is zero for all eigenstates of the QM oscillator !(*) in the convention that we normalize to real amplitude coefficients. We can choose them purely imaginary, in which case the position operator ##x\psi## yields imaginary values !
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top