Quantum Phenomena question: Estimating Lifetime of Unstable Particle

  • Thread starter Thread starter superkam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phenomena Quantum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around estimating the lifetime of an unstable particle using Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle. The original poster is confused about how to relate the uncertainty in mass to the particle's lifetime, initially considering momentum rather than energy. A participant clarifies that the uncertainty in mass corresponds to uncertainty in energy, allowing for the use of the equation ΔtΔE = ħ. The poster eventually realizes that the uncertainty should be expressed as p*m rather than p/m, leading to a correct formulation of the problem. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationships between mass, energy, and uncertainty in quantum mechanics.
superkam
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, I'm fairly new to these forums and I'm stuck on a problem. Just wondered if anyone could give me any hints or tips on how to get started on the following question:
An unstable particle produced in a high-energy collision has a mass of m and an uncertainty in mass that is p of the particle's mass. Estimate the liftime of the particle.

Homework Equations



I am assuming this question has something to do with Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle. i.e
\Delta x*\Delta p >= \hbar where p is momentum and x is some distance
From the information given I assume I have to use the above formula to get:
\Delta x*(p/m)*v >= \hbar ...? where p/m is the uncertainty in the mass described in the question

The Attempt at a Solution


As I said at the beginning I don't really know how to get started on this question, and thus the derived relationship above is all I have managed to come up with thus far. I am beginning to think that this question requires me to calculate the energy of the particle by calculating the minimum uncertainty on the momentum (i.e (p/m)*V). If the equation that I have formulated so far is correct, what am I supposed to use for delta x? From the information given I cannot see any way to deduce this. Any indication on whether I am on the right lines here or any other help would be very much appreciated. Thanks in advance, Kam.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can anyone please give me an idea whether I am heading in the right direction here, or indicate to me that I need to show more working before anyone will assist me further? Thanks.
 
superkam said:
Can anyone please give me an idea whether I am heading in the right direction here, or indicate to me that I need to show more working before anyone will assist me further? Thanks.

Okay, I'll bite. You are correct that this is related to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle.

You are also correct that position and momentum are canonical conjugates under the uncertainty principle. But I don't think that position and momentum are related to this problem.

Time and Energy are also canonical conjugates under the uncertainty principle. Also, from special relativity, an uncertainty in mass is the same thing as uncertainty in energy. :wink:

I don't think "p" here (originally from the problem statement, "...uncertainty in mass that is p of the particle's mass...") refers to momentum. Rather I suspect that it refers to a probability related fraction. For example, if due to uncertainty, the particle's mass can vary by 25%, interpret the problem statement as saying "...uncertainty in mass that is 0.25 of the particle's mass..."

From that, you should have the information necessary to estimate the lifetime of the particle.

[Edit: and I suspect that you are supposed to express your answer in terms of 'p' and 'm']
 
Last edited:
collinsmark said:
Okay, I'll bite. You are correct that this is related to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle.

You are also correct that position and momentum are canonical conjugates under the uncertainty principle. But I don't think that position and momentum are related to this problem.

Time and Energy are also canonical conjugates under the uncertainty principle. Also, from special relativity, an uncertainty in mass is the same thing as uncertainty in energy. :wink:

I don't think "p" here (originally from the problem statement, "...uncertainty in mass that is p of the particle's mass...") refers to momentum. Rather I suspect that it refers to a probability related fraction. For example, if due to uncertainty, the particle's mass can vary by 25%, interpret the problem statement as saying "...uncertainty in mass that is 0.25 of the particle's mass..."

From that, you should have the information necessary to estimate the lifetime of the particle.

[Edit: and I suspect that you are supposed to express your answer in terms of 'p' and 'm']

Ok I will take on board what you have said and I will try and solve this problem. I did not know that the uncertainty principal could be related to time and energy. Thank you for your help :)
 
Ok so I now have the equation \Delta t \Delta E = \hbar
I have used the equation E = mc^2 and substituted the values into the Heisenberg equation to get:
\Delta t = hm/(2 \pi c^2 p)
However mastering physics is saying that this answer is incorrect :(
 
Check your formula. Is m at the proper place? ehild
 
ehild said:
Check your formula. Is m at the proper place? ehild

Hi, I used the value p/m for the mass as I assumed this would represent the ratio of the uncertainty of the mass to the actual mass of particle. When I divide through by (p/m)c^2 (In the Heisenberg equation) doesn't the m go to the top? Or have I got my relationship between p and m wrong, should the uncertainty in the mass be p*m not p/m? Thanks.

[EDIT Problem solved, thanks!]
 
Last edited:
[EDIT Problem solved, thanks!]
Glad you have solved it. Here is a tip for the future:

superkam said:
Hi, I used the value p/m for the mass as I assumed this would represent the ratio of the uncertainty of the mass to the actual mass of particle. When I divide through by (p/m)c^2 (In the Heisenberg equation) doesn't the m go to the top? Or have I got my relationship between p and m wrong, should the uncertainty in the mass be p*m not p/m? Thanks.
Units are your friend! :smile: p/m does not have units of mass; p*m does have units of mass. (As long as you realize that p is unitless.)
 
Back
Top