Quantum - Two State Problem in different bases

leo_africanus
Messages
4
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


[/B]
(Working through a problem from a practice set for which I have a solution available, but still don't understand. I get the same answer as they do for part a, but get lost in part b, I think. Relevant portions below)

Consider a two-state quantum system. In the orthonormal and complete set of basis vectors ##\langle 1 |## and ##\langle 2 |##, the Hamiltonian operator for the system is represented by (ω > 0):
$$H = 10 \hbar \omega |1⟩⟨1| - 3 \hbar \omega |1⟩⟨2| - 3 \hbar \omega |2⟩⟨1| + 2 \hbar \omega |2⟩⟨2|$$
Consider another complete and orthonormal basis |α⟩, |β⟩, such that ##H|α⟩ = E_1|α⟩##, and ##H|β⟩ = E_2|β⟩## (with ##E_1 < E_2##). Let the action of operator A on the |α⟩, |β⟩ basis vectors be given as:
$$ A|α⟩ = 2ia_0|β⟩ $$
$$ A|β⟩ = -2ia_0|α⟩ - 3a_0|β⟩$$
where ##a_0 > 0## is real.

a) Find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of H in the |1⟩, |2⟩ basis.

b) Find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of A in the |α⟩, |β⟩ basis.

c) Suppose a measurement of A is carried out at t=0 on an arbitrary state and the largest possible value is obtained. Calculate the probability P(t) that another measurement made at time t will yield the value as the one measured at t=0.

Homework Equations


Eigenvalue equation: ##|X-\lambda I | = 0##

Orthonormality: ##⟨x|y⟩=\delta(x-y)##

Probability: ##P(t) = |⟨\psi_0|\psi(t)⟩|^2##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
My disagreement with the available solution comes when writing the prepared state for part c in terms of the eigenvectors for the energy.

a) From the equation for H we can write out the matrix for H in the |1⟩, |2⟩ basis as:
$$ H = \begin{bmatrix}
10ℏω & -3ℏω\\
3ℏω & 2ℏω
\end{bmatrix} $$

Then ##|H-\lambda I | = 0## gives eigenvalues of ##\lambda_1 = ℏω = E_1## and ##\lambda_2 = 11ℏω = E_2##,
with corresponding normalized eigenvectors:
$$|\lambda_1⟩ = |α⟩ = \frac{1}{\sqrt{10}} \begin{bmatrix} 1\\3 \end{bmatrix}$$
$$|\lambda_2⟩ = |β⟩ = \frac{1}{\sqrt{10}} \begin{bmatrix} 3\\-1 \end{bmatrix}$$

b) To get the matrix for A in the |α⟩, |β⟩ basis I use the given action of A on the basis vectors and their orthogonality:

$$ A = \begin{bmatrix} ⟨α|A|α⟩ & ⟨α|A|β⟩\\ ⟨β|A|α⟩ & ⟨β|A|β⟩ \end{bmatrix} =
\begin{bmatrix} 2ia_0⟨α|β⟩ & -2ia_0⟨α|α⟩-3a_0⟨α|β⟩\\ 2ia_0⟨β|β⟩ & -2ia_0⟨β|α⟩-3a_0⟨β|β⟩ \end{bmatrix} =
\begin{bmatrix} 0 & -2ia_0\\ 2ia_0 & -3a_0 \end{bmatrix}$$

Then ##|A-\lambda I | = 0## gives eigenvalues of ##\lambda_1 = a_0## and ##\lambda_2 = -4a_0 ##,
with corresponding normalized eigenvectors:
$$|\lambda_1⟩ = \frac{-1}{\sqrt{3}} \begin{bmatrix} 2\\i \end{bmatrix}$$
$$|\lambda_2⟩ = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} \begin{bmatrix} i\\2 \end{bmatrix}$$

c) The largest possible value of A that could be measured is ##a_0##, which prepares the system in state ##|\psi_0⟩ = |a_0⟩##

To get the time dependence for the wave function, I need to express |a_0⟩ in terms of the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian. The way I thought this would be done is simply by writing |a_0⟩ as a linear combination of |α⟩, |β⟩ basis vectors as follows (using the vectors found in part a):
$$x|α⟩ + y|β⟩ = |a_0⟩$$
Giving a system of two linear equations,
$$\frac{x}{\sqrt{10}} + \frac{3y}{\sqrt{10}} = \frac{-2}{\sqrt{3}} $$
$$\frac{3x}{\sqrt{10}} - \frac{y}{\sqrt{10}} = \frac{-i}{\sqrt{3}} $$

Solving for x and y gives me: ##x=-\frac{3i+2}{\sqrt{30}}## and ##y=\frac{i-6}{\sqrt{30}}## for:
$$|a_0⟩ = -\frac{3i+2}{\sqrt{30}}|α⟩ + \frac{i-6}{\sqrt{30}}|β⟩$$

The solution for the problem that I have is consistent until this point, where it gives (without showing any work):
$$|a_0⟩ = \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}|α⟩ - \frac{2i}{\sqrt{5}}|β⟩$$

Any help with where I've gone wrong here would be much appreciated!

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
leo_africanus said:
Then ##|A-\lambda I | = 0## gives eigenvalues of ##\lambda_1 = a_0## and ##\lambda_2 = -4a_0 ##,
with corresponding normalized eigenvectors:
$$|\lambda_1⟩ = \frac{-1}{\sqrt{3}} \begin{bmatrix} 2\\i \end{bmatrix}$$
$$|\lambda_2⟩ = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} \begin{bmatrix} i\\2 \end{bmatrix}$$
Your vectors are not normalized. The ##\sqrt 3## is not correct.

Note that what you are getting here is ##|\lambda_1⟩## and ##|\lambda_2⟩## expressed in the energy-eigenstate basis ##\{ |α⟩, |β⟩ \}##. So, you immediately have the expansion of ##|\lambda_1⟩##, say, in terms of ##|α⟩## and ##|β⟩## without further work.

Their answer ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}|α⟩ - \frac{2i}{\sqrt{5}}|β⟩## appears to correspond to the eigenstate of ##A## with eigenvalue ##-4a_0## rather than corresponding to the state with eigenvalue ##a_0##.
 
TSny said:
Your vectors are not normalized. The ##\sqrt 3## is not correct.

Note that what you are getting here is ##|\lambda_1⟩## and ##|\lambda_2⟩## expressed in the energy-eigenstate basis ##\{ |α⟩, |β⟩ \}##. So, you immediately have the expansion of ##|\lambda_1⟩##, say, in terms of ##|α⟩## and ##|β⟩## without further work.

Their answer ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}|α⟩ - \frac{2i}{\sqrt{5}}|β⟩## appears to correspond to the eigenstate of ##A## with eigenvalue ##-4a_0## rather than corresponding to the state with eigenvalue ##a_0##.

Got it, thanks so much for the clarification!

Normalization should be (where ##λ_{1,i}## is the ##i^{th}## component of ##|\lambda_1⟩ ##):
$$ || λ_1 || = \sqrt{\sum_{i=1}^N λ_{1,i} λ_{1,i}^*} = \sqrt{5}$$ (and likewise for ##|\lambda_2⟩##)

Thanks again!
 
OK. Good work!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top