Qubits Entanglement: Calculate & Interpret

amgo100
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Determine which qubits are entangled:

##|\psi\rangle=\frac{1}{2}(|000\rangle+i|010\rangle+i|101\rangle-|111\rangle)##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
My idea was to first calculate the density operator
##\rho = |\psi\rangle \langle\psi|##
and then find the partial trace over the second and the third qubit. Then from Schmidt rank I would know whether the first qubit is entangled with the rest of the system. Then I could repeat the procedure for the other qubits. However the result seams to be 0 and I don't even know how to interpret this result, nor how to find which of the three qubits are entangled.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you split the wavefunction into a product?
 
Ok, I've tried separating one of the qubits from the rest to obtain a product state and succeded for the second one (B):
##|\psi\rangle = \frac{1}{2}(|0\rangle_B + i|1\rangle_B)(|00\rangle_{AC} + i|11\rangle_{AC})##,
so it seams that qubit A is entangled with C (the first and the third).

However I'm still left with a question why the method with the partial trace gave me 0. I would expect it to give the same result.
 
amgo100 said:
Ok, I've tried separating one of the qubits from the rest to obtain a product state and succeded for the second one (B):
##|\psi\rangle = \frac{1}{2}(|0\rangle_B + i|1\rangle_B)(|00\rangle_{AC} + i|11\rangle_{AC})##,
so it seams that qubit A is entangled with C (the first and the third).
I agree.

Concerning the other method: Can you show your calculations?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top