Question about a Signal's Frequency Spectra and Modulation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between frequency spectra derived from Fourier analysis and the physical reality of signals, particularly in the context of amplitude modulation. Initially, the author viewed frequencies as mere mathematical constructs, questioning their existence in nature, especially with non-repeating signals like square waves. However, upon studying modulation, they recognize that frequency plays a practical role in signal processing, particularly during demodulation with filters. This realization prompts confusion about how frequency can be relevant when signals appear non-repetitive. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the tension between mathematical abstraction and physical reality in understanding signal behavior.
Noesis
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
I used to think that the frequencies obtained by a Fourier Series or Transform from a signal in the 'time domain' were simply a consequence of our mathematical system. In other words, it is a consequence of the fact that sinusoids are used to recreate or synthesize the signal.

It's just an approximation technique using an orthogonal set; and could've been done through another orthogonal set.

Since I viewed it as a consequence of our mathematical system, I did not see time signals having actual frequencies in nature.

This seemed evident to me as well in terms of a simple square signal. Due to the inverse relationship between bandwidth and time duration, a 'larger rectangle' had smaller frequency than a 'smaller rectangle.' But clearly both rectangles have NO frequency...they're just boxes!

Now that I am studying modulation, specifically amplitude modulation, I see that signals are analyzed via their Fourier Transforms and that actual filters (say a low-pass filter) are used to extract the signals again in demodulation.

This contradicts my original thoughts and so something is wrong. Frequency is being used here in practice, so there must be some link between a frequency spectra and the signal in reality.

If someone could please clarify this I would be very appreciative. Thank you.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Also..as another clarification to the above:

The definition of frequency is very clear to me: x repeating per y . I don't see anything repeating in my rectangular box voltage (gate signal) up above and just don't see how frequency has anything to do with it--except as mathematical convenience.

Thanks.
 
Noesis said:
The definition of frequency is very clear to me: x repeating per y . I don't see anything repeating in my rectangular box voltage (gate signal) up above and just don't see how frequency has anything to do with it--except as mathematical convenience.

the concept of addition is really only a mathematical concept. perhaps in another universe this purely mathematical concept of addition would have nothing to do with the reality of what happens when quantities of the same kinda stuff accumulates. but in this universe, when you have X thingies in one bucket and Y thingies in another bucket, and you pour the Y thingies into the bucket with X thingies, we expect the quantity of thingies in that bucket to be X+Y. but why should physical reality (of collecting or accumulating thingies) submit itself to this mathematical model of addition? but it does. (sometimes it doesn't exactly, such as in relativistic velocity addition.)

so, even if in a square wave, you, in your anthropocentric observation, do not see evidence of a first harmonic added to a third harmonic added to a fifth harmonic, etc., but that is how a resonant circuit might look at that square wave; as a sum of sinusoids with these particularly related frequencies.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top