Question about calculating ratio of Relative Difference

Aston08
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I was hoping someone might be able to help sort out where I am going wrong in my calculation of the ratio of relative difference.

Value1= .0759
Value2= .0544

SqRt(.0759 / .0544) = 1.181195


The above calculation seems to work, but in a situation like below where the values are reversed the calculation is missing something.

SqRt(.0544/ .0759 ) = 0.846600



The reason I say this is if I utilize the ratio to split $5,000 there is an overage

$5,000 / 2 = $2,500
$2,500 * 1.181195 = $2,952.98

&

$5,000 / 2 = $2,500
$2,500 * 0.846600 = $2,116.50

$2,952.98 + $2,116.50 = $5,069.48 ... $69.48 too much



Any idea where I messed things up ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1.181195 + 0.846600 = 2.027795, not 2.

I am not sure what you intend by using the square root of the ratio. However it doesn't seem to make sense in what you are doing.
 
Haha yea I have something wrong... I just am not quite sure where.

I am trying to calculate a delta neutral position. Most of the time the size of these positions are based on a number of shares someone is trying to hedge and the cost is whatever it ends up being to create the hedge. I am trying to calculate it the other way around, assuming I want to buy $5k worth of calls and puts based on the delta and price of each, how many do I need to purchase to stay delta neutral and as close to $5k as possible.

Basic Delta Neutral Calculation
0.5 (call option delta) - 0.5 (put option delta) = 0 Delta


Assuming I was buying a $5k combination of the following:

Call Contract
Price - $.59 each
Delta - .0759

Put Contract
Price - $.60 each
Delta - .0544

..Contracts are in multiples of 100

My thought process was that if I could determine the relative difference between the 2 delta's I could determine how much of the $5k needed to be allocated to each. But I am missing something it seems. I can get things to balance out with the first set of values, but, when I put in a second set of values like below things didn't balance as effectively.


2nd Set of Values
Call Contract
Price - $.85 each
Delta - .1207

Put Contract
Price - $1.30 each
Delta - .1419

I have attached a copy of my basic worksheet
 

Attachments

It looks like you are trying to have no. calls x call delta as close as possible to no. puts x put delta.

Therefore the ratio call/put should be approximately = delta put / delta call.
Your other equation is no. puts x put price + no. calls x call price = money available.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top