Question about capacitor voltage and inner dielectric effects?

AI Thread Summary
A capacitor connected to a HVDC power supply polarizes its dielectric material when voltage is applied. Theoretically, if a barrier exists between the dielectric and the plates, excess electrons could enter the dielectric, but the capacitor's voltage cannot exceed the supply voltage. If the dielectric breaks down, the voltage drops rapidly, allowing current to flow as potential energy converts to electron movement. The Avalanche Effect may occur during breakdown, leading to increased current flow. Dielectric breakdown offers a potential alternative to Faraday's electrolysis for producing hydrogen from distilled water without the need for salts, which can contaminate devices.
HMS-776
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
A capacitor is connected to a HVDC power supply which provides a minimal current.
When the volage reaches the capacitor plates the dielectric material in the capacitor polarizes.

Now, if there existed a barrier between the dielectric and the capacitor plate the capacitor could theoretically also operate like a transistor. If the voltage applied to the plates was high enough to break through the barrier free electrons will enter into the dielectric.

My question is, if this could occur would the excess electrons entering into the dielectric material cause the capacitors voltage to rise above the power supply voltage?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
No, the capacitor voltage can only rise to the supply voltage. Where would any extra voltage come from?

If the dielectric breaks down, the voltage across the capacitor drops rapidly.
 
When the dielectric breaks down, the water conducts electricity. Conductivity allows current, so potential energy is converted into electron movement. There is a scientific effect known as Avalanche Effect which may occur in this situation, but I'm not sure. there may be temporary electron holes causing an avalanche, which again means lots of current, and potential energy is converted into movement of electricity rather than it's previous static built up state.

It is interesting that dielectric breakdown is not taught as an alternative to faraday electrolysis in schools. As far as I know dielectric breakdown means that no salts (electrolytes) are needed, so this would be a cheaper method of breaking down water, since salts cost money to add to a device, and salts clog up/dirty up the device with contaminants. Theoretically, distilled water could be used without any salts and still produce hydrogen, since distilled water does conduct electricity without any salts at a dielectric break down. WIthout the dielectric breakdown, water is not a good conductor. Faraday did not have this knowledge back in the day when he was doing his tests.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top