Question about concentric conductors

Jason Williams
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three insulated concentric spherical conductors, whose radii in ascending order of magnitude are ##a, b, c##, have charged ##e_1, e_2, e_3## respectively, find their potentials and show that if the inner most sphere is grounded, the potential of the outermost is diminished by:

##\frac{a}{c} ( \frac{k e_1}{a} + \frac{k e_2}{b} + \frac{k e_3}{c} ) ##.

Homework Equations



##k = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0}##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
The potentials in each region are ##V_I = \frac{k e_1}{r} + C##, ##V_{II} = \frac{k (e_1 + e_2)}{r} + D##, and ##V_{III} = \frac{k (e_1 + e_2 + e_3)}{r} + E##, where ##C, D## and ##E## are integration constants. Setting the potential at the innermost sphere to ##0##, we solve for ##C##, giving us ##V_{III} = \frac{k e_1}{r} - \frac{k e_1}{a}##. Ensuring continuity @ ##b## and ##c##, I finally get ##V_{III} = \frac{k (e_1 + e_2 + e_3)}{r} - (\frac{e_3}{c} + \frac{e_2}{b} + \frac{e_1}{a})##. I just don't see how we get the factor of ##\frac{a}{c}## on the outside. Help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Jason,

I read the exercise as consisting of two parts: a) find the potentials, and b)ground the inner sphere and ... etc.
 
BvU said:
Hello Jason,

I read the exercise as consisting of two parts: a) find the potentials, and b)ground the inner sphere and ... etc.

Oops, sorry you're totally right. I left the potentials in that form because you can't solve for ##C##, ##D##, and ##E## without knowing the potentials on each surface. Is this the wrong way of approaching the problem?
 
Last edited:
you should be able to solve part a using potental zero at infinity
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top