Question about conductivity and metal bonds

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on how a strong electric field, such as that from a positively charged metal sphere, influences electron displacement in a nearby metal object and its impact on metal bonding. It is noted that electrons within the metal rearrange to counteract the external electric field, leading to a concentration of electrons at one end. The inquiry raises whether stronger electric fields result in greater electron displacement and how this affects the strength of metal bonds. Responses suggest that while some electrons, particularly valence electrons, are mobile, the overall effect on metal strength is likely negligible and undetectable. The conversation emphasizes the need for a scientific foundation in understanding these interactions.
danielgenov
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody. I would like to ask the following:
Imagine a source of strong electric filed. For example a positively charged metal sphere. Then we put a small (relatively to the source of the electric field) metal object in the electric field. Electron inside the metal move in such way, that they compensate the electric field inside the metal. The final picture is that some of the electrons are located at the one end of the metal. So, my question is, how that displacement of the electrons affect metal bonds in the metal. If the electric field is stronger do more electron displace and if so, what keep metal atoms together?
The question may look extremely stupid, but it is not. I request only serious answers with scientific foundation. As addition I am curious which electrons are mobile and can move freely at the presence of electric field, only valence electrons or other too? Does the electric filed affect metal strength and so on.

Thank you for your attention.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are suggesting that the strength would be affected then you would need to consider the total number of electrons involved in the bonding and the number of electrons which would actually be displaced by the existence of an external field. I think the effect would be undetectable.
 
I'm not a student or graduate in Astrophysics.. Wish i were though... I was playing with distances between planets... I found that Mars, Ceres, Jupiter and Saturn have somthing in common... They are in a kind of ratio with another.. They all got a difference about 1,84 to 1,88x the distance from the previous planet, sub-planet. On average 1,845x. I thought this can be coincidential. So i took the big moons of Jupiter and Saturn to do the same thing jupiter; Io, Europa and Ganymede have a...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K