Question about current in an infinite circuit

AI Thread Summary
In an infinite circuit with only a wire and an emf, the current distribution is affected by the circuit's size and resistance. Initially, the current may not be uniform, with potentially infinite current near the emf and null current at distant points. However, real circuits have internal resistance, preventing infinite currents and necessitating the use of Maxwell's laws instead of Kirchhoff's laws for large circuits. The "small circuit approximation" fails in large circuits, leading to different behaviors than expected. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping how electrical systems operate in reality.
fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272
I've asked myself the following question but couldn't think about an answer.
Imagine a hypothetical situation : you have a very large (more than 10^{10}m) circuit that contains only a wire (with no resistor) and an emf. Now you turn on the emf... will the current be the same in the whole circuit? Or will the current be null at very a large distance initially while close the emf the current would be theoretically infinite since there's no resistor?
So that you can't apply Kirchhoff's current law in very large circuits when the situation is not yet stationary.

Equivalently one can imagine a situation of a human size circuit but with very small time (less than say 10^{-12}s).

I'd like to know what really happens, just to understand better how the universe really work, it's not a homework question.
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well, reality is a totally different animal. a REAL generator will have an internal resistance, no wire will have no resistance at all, though for a small circuit it could be negligible compared to that of resistors, so you will have no infinite currents. And since now your system does have a resistance the problem is quite easily solved.
 
look for "transmission line"
 
fluidistic said:
you can't apply Kirchhoff's current law in very large circuits
This is correct. Kirchoff's laws and the rest of the circuit theory are all approximations to Maxwell's laws. One of the assumptions is the so-called "small circuit approximation" which basically says that the circuit is small compared to the wavelengths involved so that all parts of a wire can be assumed to be at the same potential. Obviously the small circuit approximation is violated for very large circuits and then you have to use Maxwell's laws.
 
willem2 said:
look for "transmission line"
Ok thanks I will look at it in details but I think they are not large enough.
DaleSpam said:
This is correct. Kirchoff's laws and the rest of the circuit theory are all approximations to Maxwell's laws. One of the assumptions is the so-called "small circuit approximation" which basically says that the circuit is small compared to the wavelengths involved so that all parts of a wire can be assumed to be at the same potential. Obviously the small circuit approximation is violated for very large circuits and then you have to use Maxwell's laws.
Thank you very much, I'm done with this.
 
Hi Fluidistic-
For a bare wire in vacuum (no dielectric) the signal velocity is the speed of light. The impedance of a coaxial transmission line with an air dielectric is

Z = (377/2 pi) Ln (b/a)

where b= radius of outer conductor and a is radius of inner conductor. When b/a becomes very large (like for a bare wire), the impedance gets very large logarithmically.
Bob S
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top