Question about finding area using Green's Theorem

Mohamed Abdul

Homework Statement


Use Green's Theorem to find the area of the region between the x-axis and the curve parameterized by r(t)=<t-sin(t), 1-cos(t)>, 0 <= t <= 2pi

Attached is a figure pertaining to the question

Bqenm90.png


Homework Equations



eq0001M.gif
[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the parameterized curve, I have been able to locate the x boundaries between 0 and 2pi and the y boundaries between 0 and 1-cos(t). However, I do not know how to proceed with the double integral because I don't have the vector field equation. Can anyone help me out?
 

Attachments

  • Bqenm90.png
    Bqenm90.png
    1.7 KB · Views: 1,015
  • eq0001M.gif
    eq0001M.gif
    664 bytes · Views: 873
Physics news on Phys.org
Mohamed Abdul said:

Homework Statement


Use Green's Theorem to find the area of the region between the x-axis and the curve parameterized by r(t)=<t-sin(t), 1-cos(t)>, 0 <= t <= 2pi

Attached is a figure pertaining to the question

View attachment 214363

Homework Equations



View attachment 214364 [/B]

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the parameterized curve, I have been able to locate the x boundaries between 0 and 2pi and the y boundaries between 0 and 1-cos(t). However, I do not know how to proceed with the double integral because I don't have the vector field equation. Can anyone help me out?

You want to end up with an integral of the form
$$ \int \int_D 1 \, dA, $$
so what does that tell you about ##P## and ##Q##?
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
Ray Vickson said:
You want to end up with an integral of the form
$$ \int \int_D 1 \, dA, $$
so what does that tell you about ##P## and ##Q##?
Would P and Q just be 1 in that case?
 
Mohamed Abdul said:
Would P and Q just be 1 in that case?
You tell me. Do you get the right value of ##\partial Q/ \partial x - \partial P / \partial y##?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top