Question about how the nabla interacts with wave functions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that the equation ψ*∇^2 ψ = ∇ψ*⋅∇ψ is not generally true. The correct relationship involves a volume integral where the function vanishes on the boundary, leading to the equation ∫_V ψ^* ∇^2 ψ dV = - ∫_V (∇ψ^*)⋅(∇ψ) dV. This relationship highlights the importance of recognizing that the derivative operator is anti-hermitian, contrary to the assumption that it could be treated as hermitian.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with vector calculus and operators
  • Knowledge of hermitian and anti-hermitian operators
  • Experience with volume integrals in mathematical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of hermitian and anti-hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the application of partial integration in vector calculus
  • Explore the implications of boundary conditions in volume integrals
  • Investigate the role of the Laplacian operator in wave functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists dealing with wave functions, and mathematicians focused on vector calculus and operator theory.

DuckAmuck
Messages
238
Reaction score
40
Is the following true?
ψ*∇^2 ψ = ∇ψ*⋅∇ψ

It seems like it should be since you can change the direction of operators.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DuckAmuck said:
Is the following true?
ψ*∇^2 ψ = ∇ψ*⋅∇ψ

It seems like it should be since you can change the direction of operators.
No. It is definitely not generally true.

If you have a volume integral and the function vanishes on the boundary, then you can do partial integration to find
$$
\int_V \psi^* \nabla^2 \psi\, dV = - \int_V (\nabla\psi^*)\cdot(\nabla\psi)dV.
$$
Note the minus sign!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier and vanhees71
DuckAmuck said:
It seems like it should be since you can change the direction of operators.
You can do that for hermitian operators. But the derivative is not a hermitian operator. It is an anti-hermitian operator, due to the minus sign explained in the previous post.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K