Question about Kinetic Friction

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the kinetic friction coefficient (mu_k) for a block in translation equilibrium at a 28-degree angle, the normal force and frictional force must be determined using the equation F_fk = mu_k * F_n. The calculated mu_k value is approximately 0.53, while the reference site lists it as 0.44, highlighting a discrepancy. It is clarified that the coefficient of static friction (mu_s) is typically higher than mu_k because overcoming inertia requires more force than maintaining motion. When measuring friction coefficients, mu_s is observed when the object begins to move, while mu_k is measured during constant velocity motion. To find mu_k, equate the frictional force to the force acting down the incline when the object is already in motion.
Physics197
Messages
70
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Run a trial with an angle of 28 degrees so the block is in translation equilibrium. Show how to calculate the mu_k value.
http://www.lon-capa.org/~mmp/applist/si/plane.htm

Homework Equations



F_fk = mu_k * F_n

The Attempt at a Solution



I have solved for Normal force and the frictional force and plugged them into the equation to get the coefficient of friction, I get roughly 0.53.
However, on the site given above, to get it in rough equilibrium, the mu_k is 0.44 while the mu_s is roughly 0.53

Just wondering, if an object is in equilibrium, are both coefficients the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. The coefficient of static friction will pretty much always be larger, the reason being that it's harder to get something moving than to keep it moving.

If it's in equilibrium and you're measuring the coefficient of friction by when it begins to move, that's the static coefficient. If it's moving and you're trying to measure when it's moving at a constant velocity, that's going to be the kinetic coefficient. Does that help?
 
Yes that does help, Thanks

But any ideas on how to solve for it?
 
Solve for which? Static or kinetic coefficient?
 
Kinetic
 
Okay, well think about it. The simplest way to find that is to set the frictional force equal to the force down the incline. What would have to be the case for you to be able to do that if the object is already moving?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top