I Question about orbits and Kepler's problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on Kepler's problem regarding the orbits of projectiles influenced by a central attractive potential, such as the Sun. It is clarified that a projectile starting from an infinite distance cannot achieve a bound state due to its positive kinetic energy, which prevents it from being captured in a closed orbit. The conversation emphasizes that while a particle can be captured through interactions with another body, such as in the case of dark matter particles, this requires additional energy transfer beyond simple motion in a central potential. Overall, the key takeaway is that conservation of energy prohibits a projectile from becoming bound solely under the influence of a central force if it starts from infinity. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing orbital mechanics.
L0r3n20
Messages
36
Reaction score
2
I've been looking at the Kepler's problem, and it looks like your orbit (elliptic, parabolic or hyperbolic) are given in terms of energy and angular momentum. I was wondering: if I have a central attractive potential (such as the Sun) and a projectile starting from an infinite distance at a given velocity and impact parameter, would it be possible to obtain the orbit equation for such an object? I mean: I would like to solve Kepler's problem for a projectile after a given velocity and impact parameter.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The quantities you quoted are directly relatable to the energy and angular momentum, so yes.
 
Orodruin said:
The quantities you quoted are directly relatable to the energy and angular momentum, so yes.
The module of the angular momentum can be expressed as L = m v b (being b the impact parameter) but what about the energy? I mean if the projectile is at an infinite distance it has only kinetic (therefore positive) energy, so I cannot find any bounded state. What am I missing?
 
If the particle can reach infinity, it obviously is not in a bound state by definition.
 
Orodruin said:
If the particle can reach infinity, it obviously is not in a bound state by definition.
But what if it starts from infinity moving towards the Sun?
 
If it is at infinity it is not in a bound orbit, precisely because of what you mentioned.
 
  • Like
Likes kasoll
Look at it this way: The bound orbits are ellipses of finite major and semi-major axis. Therefore a particle at infinity cannot be on one of those ellipses.
 
Orodruin said:
Look at it this way: The bound orbits are ellipses of finite major and semi-major axis. Therefore a particle at infinity cannot be on one of those ellipses.
Ok, i get it but I was wondering if a particle coming from infinite be captured by an attractive potential and bound into a closed orbit.
 
If it is moving solely under the influence of a central potential: No, that would violate conservation of energy.

Of course it can be captured if it interacts with another body and transfers enough energy to it (part of my research deals with the possible capture of dark matter particles by the Sun.), but this requires additional interactions beyond the motion in the central potential.
 
  • #10
Orodruin said:
If it is moving solely under the influence of a central potential: No, that would violate conservation of energy.

Of course it can be captured if it interacts with another body and transfers enough energy to it (part of my research deals with the possible capture of dark matter particles by the Sun.), but this requires additional interactions beyond the motion in the central potential.
Thanks, I really understood! :)
 
Back
Top