Question about Potential Energy.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the relationship between different forms of potential energy, specifically gravitational and elastic potential energy. It clarifies that potential energies can include contributions from various forces beyond just gravitational and elastic, such as electric fields. The conversation highlights that the definition of zero for gravitational potential energy can be adjusted, affecting the comparison between gravitational and elastic potential energies. It emphasizes that potential energy is expressed through forces, and constants can be added without impacting the force derived from potential energy. Overall, the nuances of potential energy in different systems are explored.
PrudensOptimus
Messages
641
Reaction score
0
Hello.


Does the sum of all potential energy yield gravitational potential energy and elastic potential energy?

If so, in what cases would gravitational potential energy = - elastic potential energy?

Please share insights.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what you mean in your first question, but you could do the second one easily by just changing the point at which you define your zero value of gravitational potential energy to be. Remember that potential energies really only express themselves as forces and so it is the derivative of the potential which matters, I can add a constant on to any potential in order to make the numbers work out nicely for a particular problem since the derivative of that constant will be zero and hence it won't show up in a force.
 
No, the potential energy of a system may not always be only the gravitational energy and the elastic energy. The system may be under the influence of other forces like electric fields due to which it has other contributions to potential energy.



http://www.geocities.com/physics_all"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top