Question about probability measure

AI Thread Summary
A probability measure on a space Ω must satisfy three axioms: non-negativity, additivity for disjoint sets, and total measure equal to one. The discussion explores two functions derived from a probability measure M: M/2, which meets the first two axioms but fails the third, and M^2, which satisfies the first and third axioms but may not satisfy the second. A counterexample is sought for M^2 to demonstrate its potential failure in additivity. The example provided involves a simple space Ω = {A, B} with specific measures assigned to subsets, illustrating the complexities of these properties. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in understanding probability measures and their derived functions.
Alexsandro
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
An probability measure on same space \Omega is a function of subsets of \Omega satisfying three axioms:

(i) For every set A \subset \Omega, the value of the function is a non-negative number: P(A) \geqslant 0.

(ii) For any two disjoint sets A and B, the value of the function for their union A + B is equal to the sum of its value for A and its value for B:

P(A + B) = P(A) + P(B) provided A.B = {\O}.

(iii) The value of the function for \Omega (as a subset) is equal to 1:

P(\Omega) = 1.


Now, reply these questions:

If M is a probability measure, show:

(a) that the function M/2 satisfies Axiom(i) and (ii) but not (iii).

(b) the function M^2 satisfies (i) and (iii) but not necessary (ii); give a counterexample to (ii).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We can't help if you if you haven't tried it.
 
Omega={A,B}
M(gurnisht)=0
M({A})=1/2
M({B})=1/2
M({A,B})=1
then
M^2({A,B})!=M^2({A})+M^2({B})
(Either it's that simple or i don't understand the problem)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top