Question about quantum field theory

eoghan
Messages
201
Reaction score
7
Hi there!
I'm attending an introduction to elementary particle physics and I came into this statement about the Dirac equation:
"When an interaction is added (using the gauge principle) in a field theory, then some terms appear like:
gBj
where, g is the coupling constants, B is a bosonic fields, j is the fermionic current."
And the text doesn't say anything else about that.
Can anyone please explain me better what does g,B and j mean? I know what the gauge principle is, and I guess the bosonic field is just a particle obeying the KG equation.. but what does gBj mean exactly?
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's difficult to answer without knowing exactly how much you've seen about the Dirac equation and the fermion Lagrangian that it follows from.

Step by step, we have g, the coupling constant, which is a number that determines the strength of the interaction. If we are talking about the electromagnetic interaction, this is q e, where e is the fundamental electric charge and q is the quantized charge of the fermion. For example, if the fermion is an electron, then q_e=-1, for a proton q_p=+1, while for an up quark q_u=+2/3.

B represents the bosonic gauge field, but it typical to express this as a 4-vector B_\mu. When we are talking about electromagnetism, it's typical to denote the gauge field as A_\mu. Classically, the time component is equal to the scalar potential A_0 = \Phi, while the space components correspond to the vector potential A_i =- \vec{A}. The usual gauge invariance of electrodynamics is that

\Phi \rightarrow \Phi + \frac{\partial \alpha}{\partial t},~~~ \vec{A} \rightarrow \vec{A} - \nabla \alpha,

which can be expressed in terms of 4-vectors as

A_\mu \rightarrow A_\mu + \partial_\mu \alpha. (*)

In quantum field theory, A_\mu, or more generally any gauge field B_\mu is promoted to a quantum field operator. In the absence of any other fields, the components of B_\mu do satisfy the Klein-Gordan equation, but in the presence of the fermionic field that you're considering, the correct equation is

\Box A_\mu = -g j_\mu,

where j_\mu is the fermionic current.

Now the fermionic current is the generalization of the electric current in electromagnetism. More properly, this is a current density, while

J^\mu = \int d^3x j^\mu

is what we'd usually call a current in classical electrodynamics. The time component j^0 corresponds to a charge density, while the spatial components are a current density. In terms of the fermion field \phi that satisfies the Dirac equation

(-i\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu +m)\psi =0, we can express the fermionic current as

j^\mu = \bar{\psi}\gamma^\mu \psi.

The relationship to the gauge principle is the following. The Lagrangian corresponding to the Dirac equation is

L_D = i \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu \psi - m \bar{\psi}\psi

Under a gauge transformation

\psi \rightarrow e^{i g\alpha} \psi,~~\bar{\psi} \rightarrow \bar{\psi}e^{-ig\alpha},

so we see that

L_D \rightarrow L_D -( \partial_\mu \alpha) (g j^\mu)

It is therefore possible to show that the Lagrangian

L_D + g B_\mu j^\mu

is gauge invariant provided that

B_\mu \rightarrow B_\mu + \partial_\mu \alpha

under a gauge transformation (compare with (*) above for electrodynamics). So the term g B_\mu j^\mu represents the correct, gauge-invariant interaction between the fermion and the gauge field B_\mu.
 
You're answer was great! Thank you very much!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top