Question about quantum observables

  • Thread starter Thread starter Frank Einstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    observables Quantum
AI Thread Summary
To determine which operators form a complete set of compatible observables among [H], [A], and [B], one must identify shared eigenvectors and compute their commutators. The eigenvectors of [H] and [A] share one common vector, while [A] and [B] share another. However, since A and B do not commute, they cannot be part of a complete set together with H. A complete set requires three linearly independent eigenvectors, indicating that [H, A, B] does not form a complete set of compatible observables. The discussion emphasizes the importance of both shared eigenvectors and the commutation relationships in establishing compatibility among quantum observables.
Frank Einstein
Messages
166
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Given this three operators in the same orthonormal base, [H]=[{0,1,0},{1,0,0},{0,0,1}], [A]=[{1,0,0},{0,1,0},{0,0,1}] and =[{1,1,1},{1,1,1},{1,1,1}], tell which of these observables form a complete set of compatible observables:
[H], [H,A], [H,B] or [H,A,B]

Homework Equations


None

The Attempt at a Solution


For a complete set of observables has to exist an orthonormal base formed by common eigenvectors to all the operators; here , the eigenvectors of the operators are [H]==>{{-1, 1, 0}, {0, 0, 1}, {1, 1, 0}}
[A]==>{{0, 0, 1}, {0, 1, 0}, {1, 0, 0}} and ==>{{1, 1, 1}, {-1, 0, 1}, {-1, 1, 0}}
Since H and A share {0, 0, 1} and A and B share {-1, 1, 0}, I think that the anwser is [H,A,B], can someone please tell me if my gess is right?

Thanks for reading.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can check your answer by computing the commutators ## [H,A] = HA-AH ##, ## [H,B] ##, and ##[A,B]##. They should all vanish.
 
  • Like
Likes Frank Einstein
Well, A and B don't commute, I have checked it.
 
Noting which eigenvectors are shared is a good place to start, like when you noted that ##A## and ##H## share ##[0,0,1]##. However, the eigenspaces of these operators are three dimensional, and so a common eigenbasis must contain three vectors.

To investigate whether we can find two other shared eigenbasis vectors, we need to look at the eigenvalues too. For suppose an eigenvector, ## |f_1\rangle ##, of ## A ## can be written as a linear combination of two eigenvectors, ## |e_1\rangle ##, and ## |e_2\rangle ##, of ##H##, both with the same eigenvalue ## \lambda ##. We would have ## | f_1 \rangle = c_1 |e_1 \rangle + c_2 |e_2 \rangle ##, and thus

##H |f_1 \rangle = c_1 H|e_1 \rangle + c_2 H|e_2 \rangle = c_1 \lambda |e_1 \rangle + c_2 \lambda |e_2 \rangle = \lambda(c_1 |e_1\rangle + c_2 |e_2\rangle) = \lambda |f_1 \rangle##.

So ## |f_1 \rangle## would be an eigenvector of both ##A## and ##H##. To summarize, in a given basis, if two operators either share the same eigenvectors or if the eigenvectors of one can be written in terms of those for the other with the same eigenvalues, then the two observables are compatible.

Hopefully these remarks give you an idea of how to solve your problem independently of the commutator approach.
 
  • Like
Likes Frank Einstein
I will study that; thank you very much for your help.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top