Question about rolling friction

AI Thread Summary
Rolling friction acts on a ball as it rolls, causing deformation at the contact point with the floor, which generates a torque that contributes to rolling motion. However, this friction also dissipates energy as heat, leading to a gradual reduction in the ball's kinetic energy. As the kinetic energy decreases, the speed of the rolling body diminishes until it eventually comes to a stop. The concept of rolling friction can be confusing, as it seems to assist motion while simultaneously opposing it. Ultimately, the energy dissipation caused by friction is what leads to the cessation of motion.
Kaneki123
Messages
120
Reaction score
3
Ok...Suppose I try to roll a ball to the right...Its surface at the point of contact with the floor would be deformed, which would cause some ''rolling friction'' to the left, which in turn would cause some clockwise torque(rolling motion) in the ball...(please point out if something is wrong in my assumption)...My question is that this ''rolling friction'' is actually contributing to the rolling motion of the body, YET it is observed that rolling body eventually comes to a stop...So how does a rolling body comes to a stop?...Another thing is that , if this rolling friction is actually contributing to motion, how is it ''friction''?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kaneki123 said:
cause some clockwise torque(rolling motion)
Torque is not motion. Resistance is always opposed to motion, and doesn't "cause" it.
 
Last edited:
Much easier think of energy dissipation rather than the nuts and bolts of the how friction acts .

If there is friction acting to oppose the motion of an object then there is dissipation of energy as heat .

The moving object has kinetic energy . If energy is being dissipated then that kinetic energy must be reducing with time . Reduction of kinetic energy means reduction of speed . Eventually all kinetic energy is lost and motion ceases .
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top