Question about source transforms

  • Thread starter Thread starter academi4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Source
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of a 1M ohm resistor when a voltage source in series is replaced with a current source in parallel. The user expected the current through the resistor to remain constant but found it changed, prompting a deeper analysis of power absorption. They propose that while the internal conditions of the resistor and sources may vary, the overall output to the circuit remains consistent. The user questions whether the total power absorbed by the resistor and current source equals that of the resistor and voltage source. The conclusion emphasizes that the actual current is contingent on the entire circuit configuration.
academi4
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have a question about something I encountered while working a problem.

http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/5899/questionnz.jpg

I replaced the voltage source in series with the resistor, with a current source in parallel.

I was expecting the current through the 1M ohm resistor to stay the same. Upon inspection, they are different.

I thought about it for a long time and came up with this explanation, can you please tell me if I am thinking correctly:

1.) The resistor and current or voltage source pair can have stuff change in them, but if you draw a box around them, then the output voltage and current to the rest of the circuit is the same.

2.) Since the current through that resistor changes, the power it absorbs changes. However, I suspect:

total power absorbed by 1M ohm resistor + current source = total power absorbed by 1M ohm resistor + voltage source.

Is that correct?

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
The two power sources (to the left of the 470K resistor) are equivalent.
They will deliver 9 volts open circuit and 9 microamps short circuit.

The actual current depends on the rest of the circuit.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top