Tetrad Formalism: Finding e^{a \mu}?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ngkamsengpeter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tetrad
ngkamsengpeter
Messages
193
Reaction score
0
I am new to tetrad formalism in general relativity. I understand that e^{a}_{\mu} is the component of a tetrad basis but what is meaning of e^{a \mu} and how do i find it? For example, e^{a}_{\mu} is a diagonal matrix (a,b,c,d), how do I find e^{a \mu}? Just raise the index using metric tensor g^{\nu \mu}?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a good explanation in section 5.8 of the attached notes.
 

Attachments

Mentz114 said:
There is a good explanation in section 5.8 of the attached notes.
Thanks. Let see if I understand it correctly.

Let say my metric tensor g_{\mu \nu} is a diagonal matrix (a^2,b^2,c^2,d^2) and we choose the tetrad e^{m}_{\mu} as (a,b,c,d), then the \gamma_{mn} is equal to (1,1,1,1) right? And we use this \gamma_{mn} to raise and lower the tetrad indices m and n right?

Besides, if my metric tensor is not a diagonal matrix, is there a simple way to find the corresponding tetrad?

Thanks.
 
ngkamsengpeter said:
Thanks. Let see if I understand it correctly.

Let say my metric tensor g_{\mu \nu} is a diagonal matrix (a^2,b^2,c^2,d^2) and we choose the tetrad e^{m}_{\mu} as (a,b,c,d), then the \gamma_{mn} is equal to (1,1,1,1) right? And we use this \gamma_{mn} to raise and lower the tetrad indices m and n right?
According to equ(3), for an orthonormal tetrad, ##\gamma_m \cdot\gamma_n = \eta_{mn}##, but in general ##\gamma_m \cdot\gamma_n = \gamma_{mn}##. I assume the dot is the tensor product.

Besides, if my metric tensor is not a diagonal matrix, is there a simple way to find the corresponding tetrad?
If you can write the line element as a sum of squares, it's possible to read off the static frame field. But for the frame field of a general worldline, I don't know a method that works every time.
I have had success finding a frame cobasis for a 4-velocity ##u^\mu## by setting the components of the cobasis vectors so ##{\vec{e}}_0=u_\mu##, which points the time-like cobasis vector in the right direction. One has to guess the structure of the other ##{\vec{e}}_i##, while keeping the vectors independent, and put in unknowns for the components. Then calculate ##g_{\mu\nu} = -{\vec{e}}_0 \otimes {\vec{e}}_0 + \sum_i {\vec{e}}_i \otimes {\vec{e}}_i## and iteratively eliminate the unknowns. There could be better ways to do this, but I don't know them.

( The tensor product above corresponds to equ(12) in the notes, with ##\gamma=\eta##, if the rows of the tetrad ##{e^m}_\mu## are the cobasis vectors)).

If that isn't clear I can show you an example.
 
Last edited:
Mentz114 said:
According to equ(3), for an orthonormal tetrad, ##\gamma_m \cdot\gamma_n = \eta_{mn}##, but in general ##\gamma_m \cdot\gamma_n = \gamma_{mn}##. I assume the dot is the tensor product.


If you can write the line element as a sum of squares, it's possible to read off the static frame field. But for the frame field of a general worldline, I don't know a method that works every time.
I have had success finding a frame cobasis for a 4-velocity ##u^\mu## by setting the components of the cobasis vectors so ##{\vec{e}}_0=u_\mu##, which points the time-like cobasis vector in the right direction. One has to guess the structure of the other ##{\vec{e}}_i##, while keeping the vectors independent, and put in unknowns for the components. Then calculate ##g_{\mu\nu} = -{\vec{e}}_0 \otimes {\vec{e}}_0 + \sum_i {\vec{e}}_i \otimes {\vec{e}}_i## and iteratively eliminate the unknowns. There could be better ways to do this, but I don't know them.

( The tensor product above corresponds to equ(12) in the notes, with ##\gamma=\eta##, if the rows of the tetrad ##{e^m}_\mu## are the cobasis vectors)).

If that isn't clear I can show you an example.

Can you show me an example so that it is much clearer?

Thanks.
 
ngkamsengpeter said:
Can you show me an example so that it is much clearer?
.
I'm going to use matrices to show this because it will be quicker. Given this metric
## \left[ \begin{array}{cccc}
g00 & g01 & 0 & 0\\\
g01 & g11 & 0 & 0\\\
0 & 0 & g22 & 0\\\
0 & 0 & 0 & g33\end{array}
\right]
##
and making a guess at the cobasis vectors,
##\mathbf{e_0}=\left[ \begin{array}{cccc} a & b & 0 & 0\end{array} \right],\ \mathbf{e_1}=\left[ \begin{array}{cccc} c & d & 0 & 0\end{array} \right],\ \mathbf{e_2}=\left[ \begin{array}{cccc} 0 & 0 & \sqrt{g22} & 0\end{array} \right],\ \mathbf{e_3}=\left[ \begin{array}{cccc} 0 & 0 & 0 & \sqrt{g33}\end{array} \right]
##
where a,b,c,d are unknown. Now we calculate the tensor product of the covector ( see my previous) and get
## \left[ \begin{array}{cccc}
{c}^{2}-{a}^{2} & c\,d-a\,b & 0 & 0\\\
c\,d-a\,b & d^2-b^2 & 0 & 0\\\
0 & 0 & g22 & 0\\\
0 & 0 & 0 & g33\end{array}
\right]
##
Now we can start eliminating a,b,c and d. For instance, we have the equation
##c\,d-a\,b=g01## or ##c=\frac{g01+a\,b}{d}##. Now substitute this value into the cobasis vectors and recalculate the tensor product and repeat.

To give some physical meaning to this choose ##{\mathbf{e}}_0## to be the 4-velocity covector of some worldline. For a static observer b will be zero.

This is a basic, brute-force method ( I have software to do this ) and maybe someone will come up with something elegant.

Over to you, have fun :wink:

[edit]
I get ##b=0##, ##a=\sqrt{\frac{{g01}^{2}}{g11}-g00}##, ##c=\frac{g01}{\sqrt{g11}}## and ##d=\sqrt{g11}##
 
Last edited:
ngkamsengpeter said:
I am new to tetrad formalism in general relativity. I understand that e^{a}_{\mu} is the component of a tetrad basis but what is meaning of e^{a \mu} and how do i find it? For example, e^{a}_{\mu} is a diagonal matrix (a,b,c,d), how do I find e^{a \mu}? Just raise the index using metric tensor g^{\nu \mu}?

Thanks.

Are you familiar the coordinate basis \left\{ \partial / \partial x^\mu \right\} associated with the coordinate system \left\{ x^\mu \right\}?
 
Mentz114 said:
I'm going to use matrices to show this because it will be quicker. Given this metric
## \left[ \begin{array}{cccc}
g00 & g01 & 0 & 0\\\
g01 & g11 & 0 & 0\\\
0 & 0 & g22 & 0\\\
0 & 0 & 0 & g33\end{array}
\right]
##
and making a guess at the cobasis vectors,
##\mathbf{e_0}=\left[ \begin{array}{cccc} a & b & 0 & 0\end{array} \right],\ \mathbf{e_1}=\left[ \begin{array}{cccc} c & d & 0 & 0\end{array} \right],\ \mathbf{e_2}=\left[ \begin{array}{cccc} 0 & 0 & \sqrt{g22} & 0\end{array} \right],\ \mathbf{e_3}=\left[ \begin{array}{cccc} 0 & 0 & 0 & \sqrt{g33}\end{array} \right]
##
where a,b,c,d are unknown. Now we calculate the tensor product of the covector ( see my previous) and get
## \left[ \begin{array}{cccc}
{c}^{2}-{a}^{2} & c\,d-a\,b & 0 & 0\\\
c\,d-a\,b & d^2-b^2 & 0 & 0\\\
0 & 0 & g22 & 0\\\
0 & 0 & 0 & g33\end{array}
\right]
##
Now we can start eliminating a,b,c and d. For instance, we have the equation
##c\,d-a\,b=g01## or ##c=\frac{g01+a\,b}{d}##. Now substitute this value into the cobasis vectors and recalculate the tensor product and repeat.

To give some physical meaning to this choose ##{\mathbf{e}}_0## to be the 4-velocity covector of some worldline. For a static observer b will be zero.

This is a basic, brute-force method ( I have software to do this ) and maybe someone will come up with something elegant.

Over to you, have fun :wink:

[edit]
I get ##b=0##, ##a=\sqrt{\frac{{g01}^{2}}{g11}-g00}##, ##c=\frac{g01}{\sqrt{g11}}## and ##d=\sqrt{g11}##

Thanks for the example.

Actually I am trying to study the dirac equation in curved spacetime. Do you have example how to calculate the spin connection?

Thanks.
 
Back
Top