Accelerating Expansion of Cosmos: Measured in Multiple Directions?

In summary, it is possible for the acceleration of the separation between galaxies to be positive, regardless of direction.
  • #1
exmarine
241
11
Does anyone know if the accelerating expansion of the universe was measured in more than one direction? Unlike the expansion having no obvious center, it seems like the accelerating expansion would have to point to a “center”.

Our galaxy, for example, cannot be accelerating away from a supernova in one direction as well as another in the opposite direction.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
exmarine said:
Our galaxy, for example, cannot be accelerating away from a supernova in one direction as well as another in the opposite direction.
This conclusion is wrong. It is perfectly possible.

Consider ants moving on an elastic band that stretches such that at time ##t## it has total length ##a(t)##. The ants may describe their positions in terms of their fractional position on the band, e.g., an ant at the mid point would say it is at ##x = 0.5##. The actual distance between two ants at ##x_1## and ##x_2##, respectively, is then ##a(t) |x_1 - x_2|##. Given that the ants remain at fixed ##x_i##, their relative separation speed is ##a'(t)|x_1 - x_2|## (which is the ant-universe equivalent of Hubble's law) and the acceleration of their relative separation is ##a''(t)|x_1 - x_2|##. Note that this is positive if ##a''(t) > 0## regardless of whether ##x_1 < x_2## or ##x_2 < x_1##.
 
  • Like
Likes Bandersnatch and Dale
  • #3
??
Can you line up 3 ants in a row, and maintain that the middle one can accelerate away from both #1 and #3?
 
  • #4
exmarine said:
??
Can you line up 3 ants in a row, and maintain that the middle one can accelerate away from both #1 and #3?
Why not! Say the middle one is standing still, and the other two are accelerating away from it, one to the left, one to the right.
 
  • #5
exmarine said:
??
Can you line up 3 ants in a row, and maintain that the middle one can accelerate away from both #1 and #3?

In Newtonian physics, the two end ants would have to accelerate away from the middle ant. In General Realtivity, all three ants can all be "at rest" (relative to the cosmological frame, the Cosmological Microwave Background frame), but due to the acceleration expansion of the universe, all three ants can and do accelerate away from each other.

The "baloon" analogy is often used to illustrate how this is possible - it's only an analogy, but it may be helpful. See for instance http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/balloon0.html or try google.
 
  • #6
exmarine said:
??
Can you line up 3 ants in a row, and maintain that the middle one can accelerate away from both #1 and #3?
You are entirely missing the point. The ants are not themselves accelerating relative to the elastic band. It is the growth of the elastic band that is accelerating and therefore the growth speed of the distance between the ants is increasing.
 
  • #7
exmarine said:
Can you line up 3 ants in a row, and maintain that the middle one can accelerate away from both #1 and #3?
"Accelerate" in the context of space inflation means that the distances are increasing at an increasing rate. That is perfectly possible for 3 ants on a rubber band.
 
  • #8
Orodruin said:
This conclusion is wrong. It is perfectly possible.

Consider ants moving on an elastic band that stretches such that at time ##t## it has total length ##a(t)##. The ants may describe their positions in terms of their fractional position on the band, e.g., an ant at the mid point would say it is at ##x = 0.5##. The actual distance between two ants at ##x_1## and ##x_2##, respectively, is then ##a(t) |x_1 - x_2|##. Given that the ants remain at fixed ##x_i##, their relative separation speed is ##a'(t)|x_1 - x_2|## (which is the ant-universe equivalent of Hubble's law) and the acceleration of their relative separation is ##a''(t)|x_1 - x_2|##. Note that this is positive if ##a''(t) > 0## regardless of whether ##x_1 < x_2## or ##x_2 < x_1##.

Oh I see what you are saying. The a(t) is the scale factor in the Friedman metric? Got it. Thanks very much.
 

1. What is the accelerating expansion of the cosmos?

The accelerating expansion of the cosmos refers to the phenomenon where the universe is expanding at an increasing rate. This means that the distance between galaxies and other celestial bodies is growing at a faster pace over time.

2. How is the accelerating expansion of the cosmos measured?

The accelerating expansion of the cosmos is measured using various methods, such as supernova observations, cosmic microwave background radiation, and baryon acoustic oscillations. These techniques rely on precise measurements of distances and velocities of celestial objects.

3. What is the significance of measuring the accelerating expansion of the cosmos in multiple directions?

Measuring the accelerating expansion of the cosmos in multiple directions allows us to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon. By studying the expansion in different directions, we can determine if it is uniform or if there are variations, which can provide valuable insights into the nature of the universe.

4. What are the implications of the accelerating expansion of the cosmos?

The accelerating expansion of the cosmos has significant implications for our understanding of the universe and its future. It suggests that the expansion may continue indefinitely, leading to a fate known as the "Big Freeze," where the universe becomes too cold and dark to sustain life.

5. How does the accelerating expansion of the cosmos relate to dark energy?

Dark energy is the leading theory to explain the accelerating expansion of the cosmos. It is a mysterious force that is thought to make up around 70% of the total energy in the universe. Its presence is believed to be the driving force behind the acceleration of the universe's expansion.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
48
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
30
Views
653
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
50
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
715
Back
Top