Question about the GR gravitational redshift experiment

cang.ye1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
GR predict that a photon climbing in the Earth's gravitational field will lose energy and will consequently be redshifted.

A test was done by Pound and Snider in 1965 using the Mossbauer effect
They measured the redshift experienced by a 14.4 Kev rays from the decay of Fe in climbing up a 20 m tower by determining the speed at which a detector at the top must be moved in order to maximize the detection rate i.e. the velocity blueshift balances the gravitational redshift.

My question is: how the frequency can be changed by gravitation?
Suppose sender was turned on for 1 month, it send N(very very huge number) waves, how many waves the receiver should receive? It's definitely N. No wave is lost or created in the 22.6 meter long road.
The sender keeps sending for 1 month, how long the receiver takes to receive the N waves? it's 1 month exactly.

Frequency v = N / T, how the receiver can get a different frequency? redshift or blueshift?

If gama ray device is not good for 1 month non-stop sending, we can use a short wave radio. It's the same but easier to think and understand.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cang.ye1 said:
GR predict that a photon climbing in the Earth's gravitational field will lose energy and will consequently be redshifted.

A test was done by Pound and Snider in 1965 using the Mossbauer effect
They measured the redshift experienced by a 14.4 Kev rays from the decay of Fe in climbing up a 20 m tower by determining the speed at which a detector at the top must be moved in order to maximize the detection rate i.e. the velocity blueshift balances the gravitational redshift.

My question is: how the frequency can be changed by gravitation?
Suppose sender was turned on for 1 month, it send N(very very huge number) waves, how many waves the receiver should receive? It's definitely N. No wave is lost or created in the 22.6 meter long road.
The sender keeps sending for 1 month, how long the receiver takes to receive the N waves? it's 1 month exactly.

Frequency v = N / T, how the receiver can get a different frequency? redshift or blueshift?

If gama ray device is not good for 1 month non-stop sending, we can use a short wave radio. It's the same but easier to think and understand.

The frequency of the photon isn't actually changed. The local time rate changes between the bottom and the top, so when a photon created at a different potential is compared with a similar resonance at the local location, it appears to have changed in comparison.
 
Jonathan Scott said:
The frequency of the photon isn't actually changed. The local time rate changes between the bottom and the top, so when a photon created at a different potential is compared with a similar resonance at the local location, it appears to have changed in comparison.


I don't think the time rate is changed by gravitation.
There are many kinds of clocks, atomic, gravitational, mechanical, chemical, or even biological. Their time rate varies to bi-direction with gravitation change.

The test should proved light velocity change.
That is, from up to bottom, the light velocity gets higher.
Frequency v keep constant, wave length becomes longer, the speed get higher.
 
cang.ye1 said:
I don't think the time rate is changed by gravitation.
There are many kinds of clocks, atomic, gravitational, mechanical, chemical, or even biological. Their time rate varies to bi-direction with gravitation change.

The test should proved light velocity change.
That is, from up to bottom, the light velocity gets higher.
Frequency v keep constant, wave length becomes longer, the speed get higher.

The relative time rate of a standard clock and any other local process is definitely changed by gravitational potential, which is what this experiment illustrates. However, this is not the only change.

If you try to create a flat coordinate system which covers both locations, then both the time rate and the size of a ruler vary with gravitational potential, and the coordinate speed of light varies with both, so it varies twice as much. In an isotropic coordinate system (one in which the scale factor between local and coordinate space is the same in all directions) the speed of light is approximately proportional to 1 + 2\phi/c^2 where \phi is the Newtonian potential, typically given by -\,Gm/rc^2, so light apparently speeds up as it rises within a potential.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top