Question about the Hamiltonian and the third law of thermodynamics

AI Thread Summary
The third law of quantum mechanics asserts that a system at absolute zero has zero entropy, implying a unique microstate configuration for a given macrostate. While the momentum of particles must be zero, the positions can be shuffled without altering the macrostate, raising questions about the role of particle positions in determining entropy. The discussion suggests that entropy may be influenced primarily by quadratic and higher-order terms in the Hamiltonian. A further inquiry is made into whether there is only one stable spatial configuration for particles at absolute zero, potentially limiting the ability to change positions while maintaining that temperature. This leads to a deeper exploration of the relationship between particle configuration and entropy at absolute zero.
floyd0117
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
The third law of quantum mechanics states that a system at absolute zero temperature has zero entropy. Entropy can be conceived as an expression of the number of possible microstates that can produce an identical macrostate. At zero entropy, there should be exactly *one* microstate configuration that can produce the macrostate in question.

For instance, take the following macrostate as an example,

- T = 0
- V = v, dV/dt = 0
- P = p, dP/dt = 0

Indeed the microstate describing this macrostate is unique in quadratic terms (the momentum of every particle must be zero). But it does not seem to be unique in the first-order terms - I can shuffle the positions of the particles all I want and keep producing the same macrostate.

So, by formal definition, is entropy only affected by quadratic and higher order terms of the Hamiltonian of the N particles contributing to the macrostate?
 
Science news on Phys.org
floyd0117 said:
I can shuffle the positions of the particles all I want and keep producing the same macrostate.
Quantum particles are indistinguishable, so shuffling positions gives the same microstate.
 
Dale said:
Quantum particles are indistinguishable, so shuffling positions gives the same microstate.
Okay sure, I should have said to actually change the positions rather than "shuffling" them, so that each position is new and was not realized in the previous configuration.

Edit: could it be that there is in fact only one stable solution to the spatial configuration of a set of particles at T=0? And therefore I cannot change the positions and actually maintain absolute zero temperature?
 
Last edited:
Problem: You’re an Uber driver with a Tesla Model 3. Today’s low: 30F, high: 65F. You want to reach a USD$ profit target in the least number of hours, but your choices could have added cost. Do you preheat the battery only when you are headed to the charging station (to increase the charging rate by warming the battery — however the battery might not be “warm enough” when your reach the charger and thus slower charging rates), or do you always “navigate to the charger” the entire day (which...
Thread 'Is Callen right in claiming dQ=TdS for all quasi-static processes?'
Hello! I am currently reading the second edition of Callen's Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics, and I have a question regarding Callen's definition of quasi-static. On page 96, Callen says: Another way of characterizing Callen's definition is that a process is quasi-static if it traces out a continuous curve in the system's configuration space. So far it's all well and good. A little later, Callen claims that the identification of $$TdS$$ as the heat transfer is only...
Been around 40 years since I took basic physics in college and while I remember doing some examples of insulation values / energy conduction, I doubt I could to the math now even if I could find the formulas. I have some some corrugated plastic sheet (think of the plastic signs you see on the side of the road) that is used in bee hives. Also have some used in a green house though a bit different in dimensions than this example but the general approach should still apply. Typically, both...
Back
Top