Question about the Microscopic Model of Current

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 731016
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Model
Click For Summary
A uniform conductor is defined as one where the conductance remains constant throughout its length, typically represented as a cylindrical shape. In contrast, a non-uniform conductor has varying conductance at different points, which complicates calculations and analyses of current flow. The discussion highlights the importance of uniformity in simplifying the understanding of electrical properties. The lack of clear definitions in textbooks regarding these terms leads to confusion among learners. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the fundamentals of electrical conduction.
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
Why do they say uniform conductor?
1670823887618.png

Many thanks!
 

Attachments

  • 1670823852907.png
    1670823852907.png
    62.8 KB · Views: 115
Physics news on Phys.org
Because a non-uniform conductor would significantly complicate things.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
Orodruin said:
Because a non-uniform conductor would significantly complicate things.
Thanks for your reply @Orodruin !

What's a non-uniform conductor? The textbook does not seem to define these 'uniform' or 'non-uniform' conductors.

Am I correct to say that a uniform conductor is cylindrical, while a non-uniform conductor can have any geometry as long as it is open at both ends.

Many thanks,
Callum
 
Orodruin said:
Because a non-uniform conductor would significantly complicate things.
Thanks for your reply @Orodruin ! How would a non-uniform conductor significantly complicate thing?

Many thanks!
 
Callumnc1 said:
What's a non-uniform conductor?
One in which the conductance varies from place to place within it.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
haruspex said:
One in which the conductance varies from place to place within it.
Thank you @haruspex !
 
Thread 'Chain falling out of a horizontal tube onto a table'
My attempt: Initial total M.E = PE of hanging part + PE of part of chain in the tube. I've considered the table as to be at zero of PE. PE of hanging part = ##\frac{1}{2} \frac{m}{l}gh^{2}##. PE of part in the tube = ##\frac{m}{l}(l - h)gh##. Final ME = ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}gh^{2}## + ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}##. Since Initial ME = Final ME. Therefore, ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}## = ##\frac{m}{l}(l-h)gh##. Solving this gives: ## v = \sqrt{2g(l-h)}##. But the answer in the book...