Question about visible light properties.

JSEverex
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Why are we unable to see light except if we are looking at the light source or a source that is reflecting the light?

For example; say we set up a powerful laser but we cannot see the origin or the end point. The a vacuum is produced in the room to remove all possible particles that might reflect the laser's light. We switch the laser on but we cannot see the beam of light passing from one point to the other.

You can't really say that its because the particles are so small because if you take into account a lightsource like the sun, the light radiation and packets of quanta pretty much saturate anything in direct lines from the source (or anything reflecting the source).

So I guess the more appropriate question is why can't we quanta in transit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JSEverex said:
Why are we unable to see light except if we are looking at the light source or a source that is reflecting the light?
It's because light travels in a straight line.
 
You may be thinking of how we can see ordinary particles when they are on the move. That is becasue ordinary particles reflect or emit light i.e. photons.

Photons do not reflect or emit photons.
 
As has been pointed out, becase light goes in a straight line and if the laser is pointed at a wall (and the wall is not reflected) and there is no dust or such to scatter the light in all directons then not a single photon MEETS OUR EYE. And we see things when photons his our eyes.
 
Okay I get it. I feel a bit dumb. Photons don't emit light, they are the light, so we don't see it unless the photon hits our eyes, I get it.
 
JSEverex said:
Okay I get it. I feel a bit dumb. Photons don't emit light, they are the light, so we don't see it unless the photon hits our eyes, I get it.
Don't feel dumb. Having someone get a question answered to their satisfaction is a very rare and gratifying thing for many of us. Ask more!
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top