Question Clarification involving Muon Velocity and Energy

Joshk80k
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



5. What is the average distance traveled by a muon with an energy of 5 GeV? 500 GeV? (assume v is approximately c)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I wasn't really sure where to begin with this. I was under the impression that if in both instances, the velocity is approximately c, they would have the same energy?

Where is the extra 495 GeV coming from in this transition? I'm pretty sure the mass hasn't changed?

Thanks for any help you can offer!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The velocity in both cases is approximately c, but not exactly c. The question is not saying that the muons have the same velocity, only that their speeds will both be close to c (and thus close to each other).

Now, think about the function that gives energy in terms of speed:
E = \frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}}
If you've ever seen a graph of this function, you'll know that it has a vertical asymptote at v = c. So for speeds just less than c, the energy rises very quickly with only a small change in the speed. That's how you can have two of the same particle with wildly different energies but nearly the same speed.

Note that if it bothers you to assume that the speed is approximately c, you don't have to. You can solve this problem without making that assumption. But there's one particular place in the calculation where it makes your life easier to assume that v = c (or in other words, to assume the difference between v and c is so small as to be negligible), and the hint is telling you that it's okay to do that.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top