Question concerning Michelson stellar interferometer

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using a Michelson stellar interferometer as a Fourier transform spectrometer to analyze radiation from a star's expanding gas shell. The visibility curve, represented as a sinc function, is linked to the temporal coherence of the emitted radiation rather than spatial coherence. Participants suggest that the visibility curve reflects changes over time during the shell's expansion, which can be used to estimate the shell's expansion velocity and the apparent width of spectral lines. Understanding the relationship between the visibility curve and the temporal characteristics of the gas shell is crucial for deriving these measurements. This highlights the importance of coherence in interpreting interferometric data.
arrektor
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello there, I have a question concerning Michelson stellar interferometer.
It is about stars ejecting mass in a thin luminous shell of gas expanding to a size greater than that of star itself.
So it says in the exercise:
a michelson interferometer is used as a fourrier transform spectrometer to examine radiation from an area of sky neart he star so as to include contributions from the front and back of the shell but not from the star itself. the visibility curve obtained for a spectral line of wavelength 656 nm is given( sketch of sinc function).
How can I estimate the velocity of expansion of the shell and the apparent width of the component lines?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org


This is a good question. As a hint, Michaelson interferometers measure *temporal* coherence, not *spatial* coherence. So, what is the visibility curve actually measuring?
 


I suppose that it has to do with the temporal coherence of the source so this would mean that what we see in the graph is the change in visibility at different times during its expansion?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top