Question Concerning Neutrino Mass Hierarchy

Appity
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I've been reading up on neutrino oscillations and I have come across this issue. I know that oscillations are dependent on the mass squared differences of the mass eigenstates, which is why determining things like the absolute masses of the eigenstates and the hierarchy of the eigenstates is difficult.

When I see possible mass hierarchies, there are usually two options presented; the "normal" hierarchy (v1 < v2 < v3) and the "inverted" hierarchy (v3 < v1 < v2). This means that we know v2 is greater than v1. When I tried to look for an explanation, the closest I got was a description in the following paper: http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0407155

At the bottom of page 2, it states that "For the solar neutrinos, the mass squared difference \Delta m^{2}_{21} is known to be positive, since the solar mixing angle θ12 lies in the first octant."

I've tried looking up what it means by "octant" and how it relates to the neutrino parameters, but no luck. Can anyone explain or offer any sources discussing the matter? Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Appity said:
I've been reading up on neutrino oscillations and I have come across this issue. I know that oscillations are dependent on the mass squared differences of the mass eigenstates, which is why determining things like the absolute masses of the eigenstates and the hierarchy of the eigenstates is difficult.

When I see possible mass hierarchies, there are usually two options presented; the "normal" hierarchy (v1 < v2 < v3) and the "inverted" hierarchy (v3 < v1 < v2). This means that we know v2 is greater than v1. When I tried to look for an explanation, the closest I got was a description in the following paper: http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0407155

At the bottom of page 2, it states that "For the solar neutrinos, the mass squared difference \Delta m^{2}_{21} is known to be positive, since the solar mixing angle θ12 lies in the first octant."

I've tried looking up what it means by "octant" and how it relates to the neutrino parameters, but no luck. Can anyone explain or offer any sources discussing the matter? Thanks in advance!

I believe they are referring to direction of emission from the sun, not a property of neutrinos themselves. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octant
 
I think it just means 0 &lt; \theta_{12} &lt; \pi/4.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top