Question: Draining Tank problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter matthewslaby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tank
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around modeling the drainage of a cylindrical tank filled with liquid, incorporating factors like gas pressure, exit hole radius, and potential fluid dynamics such as friction and swirl. The user seeks guidance on plotting the height of the liquid over time while considering the effects of a constant gas pressure and a fixed exit radius. Initial calculations involve the volume of the cylinder and its relationship to the change in height over time, noting that the exit hole's radius remains constant. Suggestions for enhancing the model include accounting for non-adiabatic conditions and exploring the impact of a conical exit shape. The user expresses a need for assistance in integrating these complexities into the existing framework.
matthewslaby
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A cylidrical tank (R= tank radius) filled with a liquid with an opening for the insertion of pressurized gas on top and an exit hole on bottom (r=exit hole radius).

Plot the Height of the liquid as a function of time and exit radius.

Gas pressure=const.
No swirl (1D analysis)

Any advice is welcome: matthewslaby1645@comcast.net
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I want to make this problem more realistic by adding friction at the fluid exit plan and possibly swirl of the fluid (3D flow), and maybe even non-adiabatic conditions.

Please let me know if you could guide me on this. At least the solution for the simple form of this problem should be known and documented.
 
sounds like a calculus problem I had. Except, I'm clueless in terms of adding that gas factor into the equation.

so, volume of a cylinder is pie r^2 h and deriving that you get

the change in volume over the change in time=2 pie r dr/dt + pie r^2 dh/dt but dr/dt=0 since the radius is constant in a cylinder.

I mean to me, the only way that I can picture an exit hole is by adding a cone into the equation, or something cut out, but if it were cut out, then the rate going through that small opening will depend on that small opening's radius squared times the change in height referring to the speed of the volume of the liquid.
 
well radius is constant in the cylindrical tank.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top