Programs Question for comp sci majors or grads

  • Thread starter Thread starter mmapcpro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    comp sci
AI Thread Summary
Core computer science courses typically do not require a strong working knowledge of advanced mathematics or physics. While foundational math skills are beneficial, particularly in discrete math and logic, the emphasis in most computer science programs is on practical applications rather than theoretical concepts from calculus or physics. Specific courses that might involve higher-level math, such as image processing or graphics, are not part of the discussed program. Therefore, it is generally not necessary to restudy math and physics extensively before starting the computer science degree, as these subjects will not be heavily utilized in the core curriculum.
mmapcpro
Messages
41
Reaction score
1
Do your core comp sci courses require strong working knowledge of mathematics and physics?

I am transferring some undergrad credits from a physics program into a comp sci program, but
my math and physics classes were about 10 years ago. I got A's in physics 1 and 2, calc 1, 2, 3, and diff eq, but I haven't touched those books in years.

If I jump into the comp sci degree, I'll be getting into the core comp sci classes (data structures, object oriented, operating systems, etc.

Here is a link to the program: http://www.admissions.wichita.edu/factsheets/Computer Science.pdf

How hard should I stress on restudying all of that math and physics before school starts in January?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I wouldn't worry about it. IMO you shouldn't restudy those things before school starts.
A. Most of the math we use is discrete math and logic. Some probability.
B. Courses with emphasize on calculus/algebra/geometry/etc., like image processing, graphics, compression, etc., are not in your program.
C. Physics & Diff. Equations aren't used _at all_ (at least not here).
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top