Question: How do symmetries and time evolution interact in quantum mechanics?

giova7_89
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
My question is the following: when in quantum mechanics one introduces symmetry, says that a states and observables transform both, in order to mantain mean values intact (kind of like a change of coordinate system), i.e.:

|\psi>\rightarrow U|\psi>

and

O\rightarrow UOU^\dagger

while when one is concerned about time evolution, only states (Schrodinger picture) or observables (heisenberg picture) change?

The first thing to say is that if one doesnt' do that, mean values will never depend on time, which is rather strange..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at the Heisenberg picture.

What you find is an operator equation where the time evolution of an operator O is related to the commutator [H,O] via

\frac{dO}{dt} = i[H,O]

which corresponds to the classical Poisson bracket. From this operator equation of motion one derives the time evolution operator

U(t) = e^{-iHt}

and the time evolution

O(t) = U^\dagger(t)\,O\,U(t)

In the Heisenberg picture the states are constant, i.e. not subject to time evolution generated via U(t), i.e.

|\psi\rangle \stackrel{\text{time}}{\to} |\psi\rangle

O \stackrel{\text{time}}{\to} O(t) = U^\dagger(t)\,O\,U(t)

Calculating expectation values means

\langle O(t) \rangle_\psi = \langle\psi|O(t)|\psi\rangle = \langle\psi|U^\dagger(t)\,O\,U(t)|\psi\rangle

What you are talking about are unitary transformations T(a) generated via hermitian operators Ω

T(a) = e^{-ia\Omega}

But w.r.t. these unitary transformations T(a) both operators and states do change

|\psi\rangle \stackrel{\text{trf}}{\to} |\psi\rangle_a = T^\dagger(a)|\psi\rangle

O(t) \stackrel{\text{trf}}{\to} O_a(t) = T^\dagger(a)\,O(t)\,T(a)

which means that T(a) drops out from expectation values trivially.
 
Last edited:
Yes, I know these mathematics behind that, but my question is why do we do so? I mean, why one says the things you wrote in bold? Is it somehow related to active vs passive transformations?
 
The time evolution U is derived via the Heisenberg equstion of motion, the symmetry transformation T(a) are nothing else but a change of the basis vectors in Hilbert space. The only thing which relates them is the fact that both are unitary transformations.

But U(t) really does something, it transforms O and leaves the states invariant whereas T(a) essentially does nothing, it transforms O but this compensated by the change of the states.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top