Question in regards to the equilibrium law and expressions

AI Thread Summary
The equilibrium reaction A(g) ↔ 2B(g) + C(g) was analyzed with 1.00 mol of A in a 4.00 L container, resulting in a C concentration of 0.050 mol/L at equilibrium. This led to calculations showing that 0.20 mol of C, 0.40 mol of B, and 0.80 mol of A remained at equilibrium. The equilibrium constant (Ke) was calculated as 0.0025 mol/L, which some participants considered small but acceptable. Clarifications were made regarding the stoichiometry, emphasizing that for every x mol of A consumed, 2x mol of B and x mol of C are produced. The calculations and reasoning presented were generally validated by other contributors.
walker
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Considering the following equilibrium reaction

A(g) \longleftrightarrow 2B(g) + C(g)

And the question:

When 1.00 mol of A is placed in a 4.00 L container at temperature t, the concentration of C at equilibrium is 0.050 mol/L. What is the equilibrium constant for the reaction at temperature t?
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Does this mean that for every x mol of A consumed, 2(C) mol of B is produced and 0.050 mol of C is produced.

For example

We get the number of mols of C within the 4.00 L container:

0.050 mol/L C x 4.00 L = 0.20 mol C

Then we use that number to calculate the number of mols produced and consumed at equilibrium for the other gases:

0.20 mol C x 2 mol B/ 1 mol C = 0.20 x 2 mol B = 0.40 mol B

1.00 mol A - [0.20 mol C x 1 mol A / 1 mol C] = 0.80 mol A

Then for the concentrations at equilibrium:

A = 0.80 mol / 4.00 L = 0.20 mol/L
B = 0.40 mol / 4.00 L = 0.10 mol/L
C = 0.20 mol / 4.00 L = 0.050 mol/L

then the equilibrium constant:

Ke = ^2 [C] / [A]
=[0.10]^2 [0.050] / [0.20]
=0.0025 mol/L

0.0025 mol/L seems like a small number for the equilibrium constant which is why I've come here to see if anyone can check the work I've done and point out any mistakes if there are any. I think I might be making a mistake with the 2B, I'm not sure if I'm handling that properly.
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
walker said:
Considering the following equilibrium reaction

A(g) \longleftrightarrow 2B(g) + C(g)

And the question:

When 1.00 mol of A is placed in a 4.00 L container at temperature t, the concentration of C at equilibrium is 0.050 mol/L. What is the equilibrium constant for the reaction at temperature t?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ok. Keq = ^2[C] / [A]

[] of A at equilibrium = .250 - x
[] of C at equilibrium = .050 (+x)
[] of B at equilibrium = .100 (+2x) <- since two moles are being created for every one mole of A.
so now, solve [] of A at equilibrium=> .250 - .050 = .200 M
plug it into the equation Keq..

(.100^2)(.050) / (.200) = Keq
Hope this helped. Corrections to my work wil be nice. Thanks.
 
walker said:
Does this mean that for every x mol of A consumed, 2(C) mol of B is produced and 0.050 mol of C is produced.

No. It means that for every x mol of A 2x mol of B and x mol of C is produced, just like you have in you reaction equation.

But the rest seems OK. 0.0025 is nothing unusuall.


Chemical calculators for labs and education
BATE - pH calculations, titration curves, hydrolisis
 
Last edited:
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Back
Top