Question involving beats and sound waves

AI Thread Summary
When two sound waves with significantly different frequencies combine, they produce a beat frequency that is determined by the difference between the two frequencies, not the higher frequency. The resulting wave will have the characteristics of the higher frequency wave, but its amplitude will fluctuate according to the lower frequency wave. This phenomenon is similar to amplitude modulation used in radio signals. The mathematical representation of the combined waves illustrates how the beat pattern emerges from their interaction. Understanding this principle clarifies the nature of beats in sound waves.
insertnamehere
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have a question involving beats and sound waves.
When two sound waves (one with a MUCH LARGER Frequency than the other) combine, what would happen? Would there still be a beat pattern? Me, I think that if there still is a beat pattern, it would have the same frequency as that of the highest frequency of one of the combining waves. Am I right, or horribly wrong? I'm really puzzled by this. Thank you very much for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
insertnamehere said:
Me, I think that if there still is a beat pattern, it would have the same frequency as that of the highest frequency of one of the combining waves. Am I right, or horribly wrong?

Check your book and find the formula for the beat frequency. It is not the higher of the two combining frequencies.
 
If wave #1 has a much larger frequency than wave #2, then what you get is (approximately) a wave of frequency #1 whose amplitude varies according to frequency #2. This is the principle used in AM (amplitude modulation) radio signals.
 
IMO, the answer can be seen clearly by looking at the "unmanipulated" equation of "beats", i.e. the simple addition of the two waves:

y(t) = Acos(\omega_1t) + Acos(\omega_2t)

what does the addition of these two graph looks like if \omega_1 << \omega_2?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top