Question involving voltage and galvanic batteries

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the standard emf for a galvanic cell involving sodium and chlorine reactions. The correct emf is determined to be +4.07 V, derived from the oxidation potential of sodium (+2.71 V) and the reduction potential of chlorine (+1.36 V). There is confusion regarding whether to double the charge for sodium since two moles are involved, but the Kaplan test indicates that it should only be counted once. The participant expresses frustration over consistently poor performance in physics practice and questions the accuracy of the Kaplan test answers. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of understanding electrochemistry concepts in preparation for the MCAT.
dungy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm currently studying for the MCAT and most of the physics questions I get wrong, the explanations adequately help me. But, one question has me stumped.

"Question:"

What is the standard emf for the galvanic cell in which the following overall reaction occurs?

2Na(s) + Cl2(g) -> 2Na+(aq) + 2Cl–(aq)

Half-reaction (V) E° red
Na+(aq) + e– -> Na(s) –2.71
Cl2(g) + 2e– -> 2Cl–(aq) +1.36

A) –1.35 V
B) +1.35 V
C) +4.07 V
D) +6.78 V

"end of question"

The answer they provide is:
According to the table, the oxidation of Na has a potential of +2.71 V and the reduction of Cl2 has a potential of +1.36 V. The standard emf for the galvanic cell is therefore +2.71 V + 1.36 V = +4.07 V. Thus, C is the best answer.

My understanding was, to calculate the emf, I would have needed to double the charge during the reduction of sodium because 2 moles are used in the cell. But the Kaplan test clearly claims that the reduction of sodium is only counted once. Why is this? I chose D) +6.78 V

I'm tired of getting 12 every time I write the physics section practice, it's my weakest. I want better.

No, I'm not taking any silly expensive study courses to help me.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're right, it's like chemistry thermodynamics exercises, you reverse one equation, and add it to the other after multiplying (this time by two to the first half equation) to get the target equation and the voltage term.
 
That's what I thought...

I would have chalked it up to the test being wrong, but this is the second time it would have made exactly the same mistake. These are questions from the official Kaplan tests and I haven't seen any other answers that made no sense to me, so it seems like an awfully large coincidence.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top