[Question] Limit and Integration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the limit of an integral involving a continuous function f(x,y) as y approaches zero. It questions whether the limit of the integral of g(x)f(x,y) equals the integral of g(x) as y approaches zero. The consensus is that this is not true in general due to the complexities of interchanging limits. The conversation references Lebesgue's monotone and dominated convergence theorems as relevant concepts but emphasizes that the interchange of limits is not always permissible. Thus, caution is advised when applying these theorems to such problems.
Curl
Messages
756
Reaction score
0
Suppose f(x,y) is some continuous, smooth function with the property
\lim_{y \to 0}f(x,y)=1<br />
and g(x) is some other continuous smooth function.
I want to know if this is true:
<br /> \lim_{y \to 0} \int_{a}^{b}g(x)f(x,y)dx =? \int_{a}^{b}g(x)dx

How can I show that it is or isn't true? For which case will it be true or not true?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Oh this is actually easy to see if you think of the integral as a Riemann sum.
I don't know why I always think of the solution right after I post the question.

So this is true in general, correct?
 
No, it certainly is not true in general. And I don't really know how Riemann sums help you here.

The problem is that you want to interchange two limits, this is not always allowed.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top