Question on aristotles theory of motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter terpsgirl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Theory
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a report analyzing an experiment that tests Aristotle's theories of motion, particularly regarding the relationship between distance and time. The experiment involved a hall cart on an incline, with the hypothesis stating that distance is directly related to time. Participants debate whether this hypothesis contradicts Aristotle's claim that heavier objects fall faster than lighter ones. Clarifications are sought on which specific hypothesis of Aristotle is being tested, as well as the nature of the experiment's measurements. The conversation emphasizes the need for precise definitions and references to Aristotle's theories to effectively argue against them.
terpsgirl
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I'm doing a report that's due soon, and it was on an experiement...my hypothesis was that distance is directly related to time...we did an experiment w/ a hall cart and incline...I said that it proved aristotle to be incorrect...i know his theories but how should i go forth explaining...

thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
explaining...

explaining...what? :wink:
 
terpsgirl said:
I'm doing a report that's due soon, and it was on an experiement...my hypothesis was that distance is directly related to time...we did an experiment w/ a hall cart and incline...I said that it proved aristotle to be incorrect...i know his theories but how should i go forth explaining...

thx
From what I am able to glean from this, the particular hypothesis from Aristotle that the experiment contadicts, is that
"heavier objects fall faster than lighter objects due to gravity"

Am I right about this being the hypothesis to be tested?

If it is, the hypothesis is falsified by noting that lighter objects fall at the same rate as heavier objects (the frictional force from the incline should be proportional to the mass of the given object; hence the net acceleration should still be independent of object mass.)

It may be however, that the hypothesis of Aristotle you were to examine, is that, in the absence of external forces, a given object will tend to come to rest (i.e, in opposition to Newton's 1.law).
I don't see, however, how the given experiment would be a good indicator of the failure of Aristotle's experiment.

If you're still confused, please clarify what the experiment actually measured, and which hypothesis of Aristotle that was to be falsified by it.

Edit:
Hypothesis: "Distance directly related to time":
I don't understand this:
Do you mean you tried to establish if the distance traveled down an incline is directly proportional to the time spent?
(Of course, you'll find a quadratic dependence on time instead)

I have never heard that Aristotle maintained this view!
If you could cough up a reference which explicitly says he did, please do!
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top