Question on bonding and formal charge

  • Thread starter Thread starter krackers
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bonding Charge
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of formal charge using the formula: (valence electrons in ground state) - lone electrons after bonding - 1/2(bonded electrons). In the example of water (H2O), the oxygen atom has a formal charge of 0, calculated as 6 (valence electrons) - 4 (lone electrons) - 1/2(4 bonded electrons). There is a common misconception that the increase in the number of electrons around oxygen (from 6 to 8) implies a charge of -2 due to an imbalance with protons. However, this is clarified by understanding that the electrons shared in covalent bonds do not fully belong to oxygen, maintaining the stability of the atom. The formal charge reflects the distribution of electrons in bonding rather than an actual charge, which helps explain the stability of the molecule despite the apparent excess of electrons.
krackers
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
Hello! I was wondering why, when calculating a formal charge, you actually use that formula of (valence electrons in ground state) - lone electrons after bonding - 1/2(bonded electrons)

Lets take H2O.

H - O - H


The O has 6-4-2 = 0 formal charge.
However, the O originally had 6 electrons, and now it has 8, so shouldn't that mean it has a charge of -2 because it has 2 more electrons than before. Also, when that happens, doesn't that mean the number of electrons doesn't match with the number of protons, meaning the atom is now unstable? I would appreciate it if anyone could help to clear this doubt.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
That is the "Formal" Charge, not an actual charge. Oxygen has 6 electrons, 2 of which them is "shared" with other atoms. They do not fully belongs to O-atom and the other 2 electrons also are shared, so it is not like that 6-proton 8-electron system.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top