Question on finding force needed to compress system

  • Thread starter Thread starter TokerM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force System
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the force required to compress a system involving a thumb lever, pusher lever, and tooling, which is affected by a compression spring. The operator needs to exert a force of approximately 180 N to compress the spring by 15 degrees, but this level is deemed excessive and painful for human use. Recommendations suggest that the force should ideally not exceed 50 N for comfort and safety. The calculations are complicated by the need for clear linkage connections and the geometry of the levers. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the importance of ergonomic considerations in mechanical design.
TokerM
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I have attached a pdf file showing the calculation in question.

The 2 views in the pdf are section in the same line. When the operator presses the thumb lever, the pivot shaft rotates the pusher lever which in turn rotates the tooling.

The tooling is forced open via the compression spring.

My question is, how much force will the operator need to exert to compress the system, and does anyone know if/what OSHA has to say on how much a human thumb can/should push?

Thanks in advance, and if any further dimensions/info is needed, let me know, I hope I gave way more info than needed to calculate this.

Edit: For ease in calculations, assume 0 friction and ignore the mass of the levers and tooling adding to the gravitational torque of the system.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
95 views and nobody knows how to set up this calculation?
 
TokerM said:
If any further dimensions/info is needed, let me know.
TokerM: We currently cannot relate the right-hand diagram to the left-hand diagram, except for the second linkage bar (the pusher lever), which I recognize in both diagrams. Therefore, we currently cannot understand the mechanism, due to insufficient data. And the third linkage bar (the tooling) image is cut off, and seemingly does not show all of its boundary conditions; as currently drawn, it would just rotate on its pivot, without compressing the spring. You also do not show how the thumb lever linkage bar is connected to the pusher lever linkage bar, nor how the pusher lever linkage bar is connected to the tooling linkage bar.
 
One view is to be superimposed over the other. The thumb lever, and pusher lever are fixed to the same shaft. In plan view, the pusher lever is "L" shaped to "hook" on the tooling.

The tooling is similar to a ladder runglock. Due to NDAs, that's all I can say.

I'm really only looking for the final pushing force this system creates, not the detailed attachments of the mechanism. That part is good. This is one of those "works on paper" ideas.

I am getting confused by how to set up the torque calculation.

Push the thumb lever, it rotates the shaft 8 deg. The center of the thumb pad is 2.13" away from the CL of the pivot shaft.

Rotating the shaft 8 deg rotates the pusher lever which, due to the L shape, pushes on the tooling face. By pushing through the 8 deg, the length of travel on the tooling is 0.82" along the arc. This action causes the tooling to rotate on a separate shaft, in the position shown.

In order for the tooling to rotate clear of obstructions, it must be rotated 15 deg.

With the spring that has been selected, in the position shown, there is 8 lbs of force needed to compress the spring the 15 deg. The pusher lever is pressing against the tooling at a position 3.09" from the tooling CL.

I'm attaching a dwg view of everything overlapped, you'll see why I broke things into 2 sections, the pic is a bit busy!

Thanks again.
 

Attachments

TokerM: P1 = [6.00*5.54/(2.13*3.09)](8 lbf) = 5.050*8 = 40.4 lbf (180 N), where P1 = required force exerted on thumb lever by operator thumb.

I did not look for an OSHA limit. However, P1 = 180 N is far too high. Even 90 N is rather painful. And 110 N is quite painful. Therefore, you should not exceed roughly 60 % of the rather painful value; i.e., do not exceed P1 = 55 N. Or preferably, do not exceed P1 = 50 N (or even better, 45 N).
 
Last edited:
That's what I was afraid of... As the old adage goes... "Back to the board!"

Thank you for helping with the calc. From that I can find a workable setup.
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...

Similar threads

Back
Top