Question on lightbulb brightness in circuit analysis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of current in a circuit with two lightbulbs and a switch. When the switch is closed, the current primarily flows through the switch due to its zero resistance, effectively shorting bulb2 and causing it to go out. The equivalent resistance of the circuit remains the same, but the current distribution changes, increasing the brightness of bulb1 while reducing bulb2's brightness to zero. The potential difference across bulb2 becomes zero because it is in parallel with the closed switch, which explains why no current flows through it. This understanding clarifies the relationship between current flow, resistance, and brightness in the circuit.
RoboNerd
Messages
410
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement



question 66.jpg

Homework Equations


I know that power of a lightbulb/resister is I^2 * R

The Attempt at a Solution



OK.

Here's my attempt:

Let's consider the situation where we do not close the lightbulb and assume that the wires and switch are ideal because they have no resistance. I have a Total Itot current flowing through the circuit loop, and everyone is happy.

Now comes along some random guy and he closes the switch. The total current in this case will be flowing from the positive side of the battery to the first lightbulb, go through it, and then reach the junction.

My impression was that the current will then split itself, with some going into the branch of bulb2 and some going through the switch before the two sub-currents meet up and then head back to the battery's terminal.

The equivalent resistance of the initial configuration without the switch will be 2*R (R in this case is the resistance of each of the batteries), but connecting the switch with the ideal resistance of zero will have the Req also equal 2*R.

Thus, the total current in the circuit would remain the same as ElectromotiveForce = I * Requivalent, and Requivalent is going to remain the same.

However, due to the loss of some current going through the switch, the current going through bulb2 would decrease, and thus by Power = I^2 * R, it's power (brightness) would decrease while the current through bulb1 which equals Itotal will remain the same.

The explanation that I read says that the switch will short out the current, with all of the current flowing through the new pathway created by the closed switch, and none will flow through bulb2, making it go out.
With that, the circuits total resistance decreases, so more current flows through bulb1 making it brighter, so we would have B as the answer.

Why is it the case that all of the current goes through the pathway caused by the switch with even a tiny portion of the current not going through bulb2 at all?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RoboNerd said:
Why is it the case that all of the current goes through the pathway caused by the switch with even a tiny portion of the current not going through bulb2 at all?
The potential difference across the closed switch must be zero since it has no resistance (ideal wires and switch). It's in parallel with bulb2, so what's the potential difference across bulb2? What's the rule for the potential across parallel components?
 
  • Like
Likes RoboNerd
Parallel components must have the same potential difference so bulb2 must have a potential difference of zero also.

Wow. That explains a lot. Thank you very much for the help!
 
  • Like
Likes CWatters and gneill
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top