Question on relative velocity (High school motion)

AI Thread Summary
Sue's rowing speed of 4.5 m/s is measured in still water, while the river's current flows at 2.5 m/s. When rowing against the current, her effective velocity relative to the land is 2 m/s, not 0.5 m/s backward as initially thought. The key is understanding that her rowing speed remains 4.5 m/s relative to the water, which is essential for calculating her overall motion. The analogy of a moving sidewalk illustrates how relative velocities work in different frames of reference.
KVS1999
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Sue rows her boat at 4.5ms. The velocity of the river flow is 2.5ms. What is sues velocity against the flow relative to the water. I can't wrap my head around the question, since sues actual velocity against the flow is 2ms. This should mean she is moving backwards 0.5ms every 2ms she moves forwards right? Then how can the answer be sue distances 4.5ms from the waters perspective? I don't get it.[/B]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
It can help to draw a picture. Recognise that the 4.5 m/s is relative to still water. So, when Sue is rowing against a 2 m/s current (relative to the land), her net forward velocity is 2.5 m/s relative to the land.

Think of an analogy of a moving sidewalk that moves at 3 m/s. If you walk at 1 m/s (relative to still, ordinary floors) you will travel at 2m/s if you walk against the moving sidewalk and at 4 m/s if you walk with it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top