Question on rotational transform matrix, I

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the derivation of equations related to rotational transformation matrices in robotics, specifically from Tadej Bajd's book. The user seeks clarification on the similarity of triangles referenced in the text and how to apply them to derive the equations for x and z. After sharing a screenshot and additional notes, the user successfully grasps the concepts, particularly how the equations relate to the angles and lengths involved. The conversation highlights the importance of visual aids in comprehending complex mathematical proofs. Ultimately, the user expresses gratitude for the assistance received, indicating a clearer understanding of the topic.
cncnewbee
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm reading a book called Robotics, written by Tadej Bajd on my own to learn about robotics and have no one else to put my questions other than to the forums.

Here the writer on 11th page writes:

"By considering the similarity of triangles in Figure 2.3, it is not difficult to derive
the following two equations
x..."

where I can't get which triangles to look for similarities as there could be various (I'm no expert in math) and also, can't get how the formula is derived. Please explain

screen shot of book:
i46.tinypic.com/30i9nih.png

Thank you in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
look at the attachment, I have added new points and lines to your picture to make the proof clear.

We have:x= AB+BC
but BC = x' cos (beta)
and AB = TM sin beta + Mx' sin beta
= (TM+Mx') sin beta
= Tx' sin(beta)
= z' sin (beta) (because Tx' parallel to z')

hence x= x' cos beta + z' sin beta

Similarly,

z = CK -zK
but CK= z' cos(beta)
and zK= z'D= Tz'sin(beta)= x' sin(beta)

hence

z= z'cos beta - (x'sin beta)
 

Attachments

  • 30i9nih-new.png
    30i9nih-new.png
    16.2 KB · Views: 448
Quantumjump said:
look at the attachment, I have added new points and lines to your picture to make the proof clear.

Thanks you very much! Now I understand it clearly!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top