Question on timbre (Sound waves)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Absolution
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sound waves Waves
AI Thread Summary
Different musical instruments produce distinct sound qualities, or timbres, due to the unique waveforms generated by their construction and playing methods. The shape of an instrument influences which frequencies are amplified or diminished, affecting the overall sound. Harmonics play a crucial role, as they create variations in sound based on how the instrument is struck or played. Additionally, the method of sound production, such as plucking versus striking strings, further differentiates timbres. Ultimately, the combination of these factors results in the rich diversity of sounds produced by various instruments.
Absolution
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Explain why different instruments produce sounds of different quality.


Homework Equations


None.


The Attempt at a Solution


Different instruments produce sounds of different quality as they produce sound waves with different waveforms.

-----------------------

Hi everyone! I'm new here, so I hope I have posted this in the correct section... Forgive me if its not!

Back on topic, is my answer good enough? Do I need to mention why different waveforms produce sounds of different quality? Why does this happen anyway? How are waveforms related to timbre?

Thanks in advance and have a Happy New Year!

Timothy
:D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can start with the theory of harmonics. The ancient Greeks studied the harmonics of a vibrating string extensively. You can then consider the harmonics of an open-ended and closed-ended vibrating air column (flutes and pipe organs and such).

What you're looking for in each of these cases is the boundary conditions on the standing waves in the various musical instruments. You get either even or odd or sometimes both even and odd multiples of the fundamental frequency.

Various timbres occur based on were along the string or air column the instrument is struck or strummed or blown this variable will affect how strong (loud) the harmonics occur relative to the loudness of the fundamental note. Also various instruments use resonant chambers or in the cases of wind instruments, different air-column shapes which will reinforce different harmonics. Consider the shapes of the tuba vs. the saxophone vs the flute; or the shapes of the mandolin vs. the guitar vs. the bass violin.

You then go from there to disharmonic components e.g. noise and dissonant components. For example different bell shapes will have different resonances which may not fall on the series of harmonics overtones of the fundamental note. The extreme cases are the clashing sound of gongs and cymbals.

Along with these components is the introduction of "white" and "pink" noise (randomized frequency components) The blowing of your breath on a wind instrument and the "roughness" of reeds in say a saxophone or clarinet gives you the whispering sound technically called noise. The extreme example is what you get when you tune an analogue TV to a blank channel (white noise).

Finally electronic instruments allow you to control their timbres electronically and introduce various noise and distortion effects.
 
Thanks for your reply, James!

So is it correct to infer that the timbre is directly affected by the shape of the instruments? So different shapes produce different waveforms, but the exception is pink noise?
 
In the case of electronic instruments, the shape doesn't matter much. ;)

What James said was correct, but I'll put it another way, if it helps.

Timbre is the collection of frequencies in a sound. We think of a musical note as being one specific pitch, or frequency. But a musical instrument playing one note actually produces many, many different frequencies. It is the unique balance of frequencies that makes up the distinctive timbre of a particular instrument (or a particular way of playing it).

There are many things that can influence the timbre. The shape of the instrument is one of them, since it will accentuate some frequencies and attenuate others. The method of "attack" is another. Consider the difference in timbre between a harpsichord and a piano, where the major different is that the harpsichord plucks the strings, whereas the piano hits them with a hammer. Then, of course, there are the characteristics of what, exactly, is doing the vibrating (a piano string, a reed in a saxophone, a drum head, etc.).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top