Question on tourques and static equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
Determining when to use the sum of forces versus the sum of torques depends on the specific problem and the number of unknowns involved. In the case of a ladder leaning against a wall, both net torque and net force must equal zero for static equilibrium. A free body diagram can help identify the forces acting on the ladder, including the force from the wall and the force from the floor. It is essential to consider both vertical and horizontal components separately to solve for unknown forces. Using multiple equations is often necessary to find a solution in complex scenarios like this.
sodr2
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
How do you know when to use the sum of all forces acting on a body compared to the sum of all tourques acting on a body when solving for these types of questions involving ladders, hanging signs, etc...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It really depends on the specific quantity you are asked to solve for and how many unknowns there are. Sometimes you need both; sometimes one will do. Whenever there's an extended body, be ready to consider torques.
 
Ill go ahead and give you the question I have been working on:

A ladder which is 4 meters long masses 40 kg and has its centre of gravity 1.5 m up along its length, leans against a frictionless wall and rests on a frictionless floor. To keep it from slipping, it is tied to the wall with a rope which is attached to the ladder at its center of gravity.

and between the ladder and the rope is the center of gravity Fg [ down]

the angle is 53 degrees. Find all forces acting upon the ladder..

from here i am stuck...i could use tourque and put my pivot point on where the rope and gravity intersects, but then I am left with the force of the floor [up] and the force of the wall
...​
 
Last edited:
from here i am stuck...i could use tourque and put my pivot point on where the rope and gravity intersects, but then I am left with the force of the floor [up] and the force of the wall
...

Forces causes linear acceleration, torques cause angular acceleration. In this case, both net torque and net force need to sum to zero.

I'd start by drawing a diagram--in fact, it might help to just draw a regular free body diagram and ignore where the forces act (don't deal with torque). See if you can figure out any of the unknown forces from that.​
 
sodr2 said:
from here i am stuck...i could use tourque and put my pivot point on where the rope and gravity intersects, but then I am left with the force of the floor [up] and the force of the wall
...​

Well, that's just one of the conditions for equilibrium (Net Torque = 0). Sometimes one is enough, but usually it's not. Make use of the the other conditions: Net Force = 0.

Here you have three unknown forces to find, so you need at least three equations. (Hint: Consider vertical and horizontal force components separately.)

Don't be stingy with the equations. No extra charge for using more than one! :wink:
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top