B Question regarding an expression used on a test(not homework)

Matejxx1
Messages
72
Reaction score
1
We were writting a test on wednessday and for the first question we were asked to calculate the angles of the base of a tetrahedron with points A,B,C,D. ABC being its base. We were also given some relation which helped me calculate that the base of the tetrahedron is an equilateral triangle which meant that all of the angles were pi/3.

However when i spoke to some of my classmates most of then just wrote that a tetrahedron is composed of 4 equilateral triangels so that means that the anglrs are all pi/3.

Can you really do that taking into account that the question didn't specify that the tetrahedron was regular .
Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Not all tetrahedrons are regular, and not even all tetrahedrons with equilateral bases are regular. So it is incorrect to say that a tetrahedron is composed of four equilateral triangles if one has not been told that it is regular.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top