Question regarding elastic potential energy and work

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of elastic potential energy and work, specifically comparing the calculations of work done on a spring versus gravitational potential energy. The original poster presents a scenario involving a spring and questions why the relationship between work done and potential energy change appears to differ from that of gravitational potential energy.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the work done on a spring and compares it to the change in potential energy, leading to confusion about the differing results. Some participants question the assumptions made regarding the variables used in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the differences in the application of work-energy principles between elastic potential energy and gravitational potential energy. There is an ongoing examination of the formulas and the definitions of the variables involved, particularly the distinction between total displacement and changes in position.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted difference in how changes in position are calculated for elastic potential energy compared to gravitational potential energy, which is central to the discussion. The original poster's calculations involve specific values for spring constant and displacement, which may influence the interpretation of results.

gkangelexa
Messages
81
Reaction score
1
Hi! This is probably something silly but here goes.

My question involves elastic potential energy and work…
So we know that a change in potential energy = Work done, as long as the forces are conservative...
delta U = Work done
Let’s say we have a spring…
Work done/by on a spring is, W= ½ kx^2
Also, the potential energy at a position on the spring is: U =½ kx^2

So if we have a spring with K = 360, the potential energy if you push it in 5 cm is: U = (1/2)(360)(.05)^2 = .45
If we then push it to 12 cm, U is now (1/2)(360)(.12)^2 = 2.59

So the difference in potential energy from 5 cm to 12 cm is 2.59-.45 which is 2.14.

But the  U = Work done
The work done to move from 5 cm to 12 cm should be equal to the difference in potential energy from position 5 cm to position 12 cm.
But when I calculate the work done to push the spring from 5 cm to 12 cm (a difference of 7 cm) it’s (1/2)(360)(.07)^2 = .882…
.882 does not equal 2.14…

When I try this method with gravitational potential energy (U = mgh; W = mgh) it works.
The work done to lift an object from a height of 5 m to a height of 12 cm is equal to the difference in potential energy from 5 to 12.

Why doesn’t it work with elastic potential energy just like it works with gravitational potential energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi gkangelexa! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
gkangelexa said:
Work done/by on a spring is, W= ½ kx^2

But when I calculate the work done to push the spring from 5 cm to 12 cm (a difference of 7 cm) it’s (1/2)(360)(.07)^2 = .882…

no, .07 isn't x, it's ∆x :wink:
 
So why does it work with gravitational potential energy?

The work done to lift an object from a height of 5 m to a height of 12 cm is equal to the difference in potential energy from 5 to 12.
 
gkangelexa said:
So why does it work with gravitational potential energy?

The work done to lift an object from a height of 5 m to a height of 12 cm is equal to the difference in potential energy from 5 to 12.

When you are calculating the change in something you are subtracting two values.

For elastic PE

ΔPE = PE2-PE1 = ½ kx22 - ½ kx12 = ½ k(x22-x12)

and you can see that 122-52 ≠ 7

For gravitational PE:

ΔPE = PE2-PE1= mgh2-mgh1=mg(h2-h1)

and h2-h1 = 12-5 = 7.

For EPE you'd need to get the change in x2 while for GPE you'd just need the change in h (or x).
 
you guys are brilliant!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K