Question regarding Lab cross section of spectra

eigenstaytes
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm currently doing some research at the moment for my professor, and he gave me a list of things to look at. Before he had me calculate the "real center of mass cross section." Now, starting at point 0 for publication, he's having me go through and do some other things. In his list of things to do, he talks about the "absolute cross section," and the "lab cross section." Is it safe to assume that all three of these are the same? All I knew about was the lab and center of mass, nothing about the real or the absolute. If not, is there any reference you guys have that explains the difference between them all? I haven't been able to find anything.

Thanks in advanced!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eigenstaytes said:
I'm currently doing some research at the moment for my professor, and he gave me a list of things to look at. Before he had me calculate the "real center of mass cross section." Now, starting at point 0 for publication, he's having me go through and do some other things. In his list of things to do, he talks about the "absolute cross section," and the "lab cross section." Is it safe to assume that all three of these are the same?
No.
All I knew about was the lab and center of mass, nothing about the real or the absolute. If not, is there any reference you guys have that explains the difference between them all? I haven't been able to find anything.
You are correct that these terms refer, usually, to different reference frames.
The details will depend on the experiment set-up.

You know - it's a good idea to talk to your supervisor about this.
 
Would you be able to explain the differences to me about the absolute cross section, real CoM cross section, and lab cross section?
 
what's the context?
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top