Question regarding vector spaces and axioms

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of vector spaces, specifically examining a modified definition of vector addition and scalar multiplication in R3. Participants are analyzing whether these definitions satisfy the ten axioms of a vector space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the modified operations on the axioms of vector spaces, particularly focusing on Axiom 10 (Scalar Identity) and Axiom 4 (Additive Identity). Questions arise about the validity of these axioms under the new definitions, with some participants suggesting that further examination of all ten axioms is necessary.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different axioms and their validity. Some have identified potential failures in specific axioms, while others are questioning assumptions and calculations. There is no explicit consensus on the outcome, and multiple interpretations are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need to verify each of the ten axioms to determine if the modified operations still form a vector space, highlighting the complexity of the task.

trojansc82
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have quite a few problems that I believe I answered correctly, but here is one of them:

1. Rather than use the standard definitions of addition and scalar multiplication in R3, suppose these two operations are defined as follows:
(x1, y1, z1) + (x2, y2, z2) = (x1+ x2 + 1, y1+ y2 + 1, z1+ z2 + 1);

c(x,y,z) = (cx + c - 1, cy + c - 1, cz + c -1)


Homework Equations



10 axioms of a vector space


The Attempt at a Solution


R3 is not a vector space as it fails axiom 10 (Scalar Identity/ Axiom 10).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is axiom 10? And why do you think it fails in this case?
 
micromass said:
What is axiom 10? And why do you think it fails in this case?

Axiom 10 is the identity axiom.

The new definition states that multiplying a vector by scalar c will result in :

c(x,y,z) = (cx + c - 1, cy + c - 1, cz + c -1)

However, axiom 10 states that if you multiply 1 by the vector the result should be the vector. This is not the case, as the result is not the vector, but :
c(x,y,z) = (cx + c - 1, cy + c - 1, cz + c -1)
 
I don't think it's obvious that 1(x,y,z) is not (x,y,z). Can you clarify this? (i.e. actually substitute c with 1...)
 
micromass said:
I don't think it's obvious that 1(x,y,z) is not (x,y,z). Can you clarify this? (i.e. actually substitute c with 1...)

You're right, I missed it.

Substituting in c=1, you will get the same vector.

I believe this fails axiom 4, the additive identity.

(1,2,3) + (0,0,0) = (2,3,4)

Please correct me if I am wrong.
 
Yes, but that only proves that (0,0,0) isn't the additive identity. But there may be other vectors which do satisfy the additive identity law. In fact, there is one such vector in this case...
 
micromass said:
Yes, but that only proves that (0,0,0) isn't the additive identity. But there may be other vectors which do satisfy the additive identity law. In fact, there is one such vector in this case...

Any hints as to which axiom it would fail?

I'm having a hard time discerning which axiom it would fail.

I tested Axiom 7, and it does not work.

c(u + v) = cu + cv

c(u + v) = 6[(1,2,3) + (3,2,1)] = (30,30,30)

cu + cv = (34,34,34)
 
Sadly enough, you need to check every 10 of the axioms to decide whether it's a vector space. It's a bit tedious, but it must be done...

And, who knows, maybe none of the axioms fail and it is a vector space
 
micromass said:
Sadly enough, you need to check every 10 of the axioms to decide whether it's a vector space. It's a bit tedious, but it must be done...

And, who knows, maybe none of the axioms fail and it is a vector space

Check my previous post. Looks like it fails axiom 7.
 
  • #10
trojansc82 said:
Any hints as to which axiom it would fail?

I'm having a hard time discerning which axiom it would fail.

I tested Axiom 7, and it does not work.

c(u + v) = cu + cv

c(u + v) = 6[(1,2,3) + (3,2,1)] = (30,30,30)

cu + cv = (34,34,34)

Hmm, I calculated it myself, and I seem to get a different answer than you. So perhaps I miscalculated it, can you show your steps to be sure?

But my answer also failed axiom 7, so I do think that axiom 7 is likely to fail!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K